Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 41

Thread: Armouries in Protection?

  1. #1
    Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    89

    Armouries in Protection?

    Basically, are armouries worth it in protection? they help with draft and training costs, but it costs money to build them and then raze them after protection...

    What do you guys think?

  2. #2
    Moderator for:
    Utopia Forums
    Palem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    22,030
    Yes, they are absolutely 100% worth it.

  3. #3
    Sir Postalot Ordray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South East, USA
    Posts
    3,170
    If you use armories in protection, then you'll have more troops trained by OOP due to the lowered draft costs, training costs, and wages (though the last 2 don't really kick in until 19 hours before OOP if you don't train until then, which is advised.)
    Retired at one time but no longer retired.

  4. #4
    Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by Palem View Post
    Yes, they are absolutely 100% worth it.
    That is enough answer for that question... :-)

    What percent do you recommend would be most effective?

  5. #5
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,726
    20%

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    18
    I normally use 20% or 25% in Protection myself.

  7. #7
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,524
    I do *not* recommend them if you are not exploring at all and have cheap troops - but for most, at least some are useful. (There is a limit to how many banks you can use effectively.) If you are exploring more than the initial 125 acres armories are effectively required.

    You can keep them around for a day or two after protection to help get to target draft faster too, so the point where you have to raze is fairly far into the future.
    it's vs. its is ambiguous - from now on I'm attempting to use the proper possessive it's, and the contraction 'tis. (Its will just be the plural.)

    Think Different

  8. #8
    Needs to get out more DHaran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    8,402
    .... yes Armouries are good, whether you are exploring or not. Don't listen to Ethan.
    S E C R E T S

  9. #9
    Enthusiast fausto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Brazil - Not an Indian
    Posts
    417
    Even Human/Merchants should run some... cheaper is better, besides, you are on Protection.
    "There's no Knowledge that's not Power."

  10. #10
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,524
    25*415*60%*350 = 2,178,750 gc. I don't think you can actually get to 60% DR by OOP, but I grant that is a lot of money. If you are going pure spec on min acres I think you can get better mod values by using TG/Forts + Banks... but that's a fairly weird situation. If you are staying small you probably are trying to train elites, which makes the armories very worth it. While I still claim there are cases where they aren't good (in prot, of course), they are rarer than my first post would imply.

    I think I was mixing my thinking on armories with my thoughts on mills. Got something kinda in the middle of the two - slightly too "pro-build" for mills, a bit too "anti-build" for armories.
    it's vs. its is ambiguous - from now on I'm attempting to use the proper possessive it's, and the contraction 'tis. (Its will just be the plural.)

    Think Different

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    21
    @Ethan: The point of arms is to reduce costs.. reduced costs = more income = more troops trained in a shorter period, For example; by oop, Given that you got the troops waiting.

    Clarification:
    Draft rate @ 20%
    Soldiers drafted per tick: 200 .. Before: 200 x 75(price of aggressive stance) = 15k
    Soldier cost to Train: 350 .. Before: 200 x 350 = 70k
    Soldier's wage per: 70(random number) .. Before: 200 x 70 = 14k

    Total: 99k

    After adding 20% Arms...
    Draft: 11,822
    Train: 58,255
    Wage: 11,034

    Total: 81,111

    *Special Note.. These are whole day numbers. But if just so happened to get 162k(2x81,111) total per whole day, You just doubled your army production.


    @Ram: Yes, use arms in protection.

  12. #12
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    3
    use accelerated cons to build them?

  13. #13
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by The Monster View Post
    use accelerated cons to build them?
    I wouldn't, that first 16 hours you're only drafting soldiers.
    You're not training troops, or paying wages. Basic soldiers collect no wage.

    Your not doing anything but drafting soldiers, up until the last 19 hours.

    Cost of Double speed, is far greater then what you gain by having them 4 hours earlier.
    Last edited by Gawd_oOo; 22-07-2011 at 14:57.

  14. #14
    Moderator for:
    Utopia Forums
    Palem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    22,030
    I wouldn't start drafting until you get your arms in, at least.

  15. #15
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    281
    ah so its not worth it to build 100% (in the % of banks/arms) banks at hour 0, then 44 hrs before OOP switch to the appropriate 25% (of total) armories because its just not enough time with those extra banks b/c only 72 hrs protection, with 20hr build times thats 72-20=52, then 20 hrs for armories to come in + 24 hrs to train the troops = 52-44 = 8 hrs of the extra banks. is this making any sense at all?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •