cheaters never win, thank you bishop and company for keeping us safe!
cheaters never win, thank you bishop and company for keeping us safe!
So.. if you get convicted for a crime that doesnt make you guilty?Originally Posted by GSX1300R
No, because there doesn't have to be a relation between insults and violence. There does, however, have to be a relation between admin deletions and rule breaking.
Not the best analogy considering wrongly imprisoned people over the years :P This situation is more like concrete DNA evidence tho.
S E C R E T S
delete
thing i wrote was prolly said before
lol much more than the 1 page i read
Hide your pass, hide your users, Versace is gunna hack everything.
∙ Shadowlight ∙ A Mothers Advice ∙ Force ∙ Pansies .
Kingdom Crown Winner with Pansies, Brute Force, Sonata, Dreams
Province Crown Winner with Brute Force
∙ Brute Force ∙ Playboys ∙. Sonata ∙ Dreams ∙ Retired .
Fail.
There is zero difference between the logic of both these examples. They're both cause --> effect logic scenarios.
Cause: You insult my mother. --> Effect: You get beat up.
Cause: You break a rule. --> Effect: You get deleted.
Both cases start with the assumption of the Effect. You cannot integrate the Effect to find a specific Cause without more information (in calculus, a constant term).
I was not trying to hate on Bishop or mad_scottish. I was simply expecting details regarding a very disturbing situation and I expressed that. When I specifically asked for proof or details, since the article lacked both, it's a game of cat and mouse. Why?
I don't know where puppy101 got his information but I need to visit that part of the community. It's clear from this article and spiteful moderator responses that they are unwilling to provide worthwhile information here.
Wonder what is ABS politic for hack account in your own kd? Maybe you deserve punish and GB now :P
Wrong again. Sure those are causes and effects, but in this case there is only ONE cause for deletion, and that is breaking rules. It's a worthless analogy that doesn't apply at all.Fail.
There is zero difference between the logic of both these examples. They're both cause --> effect logic scenarios.
Cause: You insult my mother. --> Effect: You get beat up.
Cause: You break a rule. --> Effect: You get deleted.
Both cases start with the assumption of the Effect. You cannot integrate the Effect to find a specific Cause without more information (in calculus, a constant term).
I was not trying to hate on Bishop or mad_scottish. I was simply expecting details regarding a very disturbing situation and I expressed that. When I specifically asked for proof or details, since the article lacked both, it's a game of cat and mouse. Why?
I don't know where puppy101 got his information but I need to visit that part of the community. It's clear from this article and spiteful moderator responses that they are unwilling to provide worthwhile information here.
Admin does not release detailed information regarding other people's deletions, never have and never will. It was clearly stated they were deleted for breaking the rules, and verified by admin, this is indisputable evidence as far as reporting is concerned. You are grasping at straws. If you have proof they weren't cheating and would like to call into questions Bishop's credibility, we'd love to see it. Otherwise you are making ridiculous statements.
S E C R E T S
(I was being sarcastic)
oh true, didn't think of that
It's probably this one then
I'm surprised this didn't happen earlier. By creating banks, the top kingdoms are putting all their eggs in one basket.
This is my province. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
My province is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life.
My province, without me, is useless. Without my province, I am useless.
I must attack hard with my province. I must attack harder than my enemy who is trying to pk me. I must pk him before he pk's me. I will...
Oh gawd, I think I know who she is. I don't think she would cheat. I'd bet she was just looking at the top land targets to make hits. She hit 2 provinces right? The first was after the target province had armies out. The second was after the defense was beaten down on the target. If she was looking at targets and saw a big land fat province with no defense maybe it just looked ripe so she took advantage? I know it sounds like a stretch but if it is the person I'm thinking of then I don't think she would cheat.
In this article: HeadBangers Ball is Sanctuary, Hide Everything is Sonata-trollfaggs, I guess it was their intra-kds deal... 8)
Someone saw that Realest was threatening Sanc in the forums and wanted to even up the playing field perhaps.
Utopian 5 Sept 2005 - 5 Sept 2013
occum's razor brah
Deletions only proves that an admin **THINKS** some kind of cheat happened - it does not prove the cheat REALLY happened.
It does not even prove that every admin agrees that a cheat happened.
That's the difference
Last edited by Rago; 11-11-2011 at 04:05.
Simians FTAA!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote