orc/tact vs orc/cleric

[Hope]

hey i was just wondering what do you guys think? i'm leaning towards orc/tact but the final changes for cleric is making me rethink everything since clerics can now raise the dead back as soldiers.

[Palem]

Cleric lost that bonus...

[Hope]

um im not sure but i just checked the final changes that bishop put up i think they got it back?

[Palem]

Read again...

The Cleric
* - 50% Your Military Casualties (on attack or defense)
* 1 extra General
Lost "Troops losses on attacks or defense converted to soldiers"

Also, it's not listed on the in-game age details.

[Hope]

oh that makes me sad... orc well still which do you guys think is better orc/tact or orc/cleric?

[Hope]

and i gotta read more carefully next time lol :)

[Ordray]

I'd play Cleric, but that's just me.

[scorpio86]

Orc Cleric is still a good choice for an Attacker Province, the extra Genera makes all of the difference during war's (i have found it so anyway)

[Madchess]

Tactician to reduce the number of ambushes, orcs are inviting ambushes with their elites, so either you'll want to go Tactician or hit with +2 hours attack time with anonymorous (you'll be detected and retaled a lot anyway if using anonymity all age, since Knight or Peasant stands out if your kd fellors are all Lords and above).
I went Orc/Warrior last age because they had that bonus, with the same number of dead elites on ambushes it still took away most of the opponents reasons to ambush, so I did not get ambushed all that often.
Merging the ambush and tactician bonus just makes it all the more appealing.