Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: Top Kingdoms choise of Race/Pers

  1. #31
    Forum Addict fuzzy|'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    ZZland
    Posts
    1,382
    Quote Originally Posted by KuhaN View Post
    Uhhh, InZZ prolly went faery/merch.
    if I was still there - YES THEY WOULD OF!
    Support email: utopiasupport@utopia-game.com | Utopia | UtopiaWiki | uTools
    YouTube: Official fuZZy Video | Official ZZ Theme Music
    Jerk by nature. 1 Bogdan to rule them all!

  2. #32
    Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Stralia mate
    Posts
    80
    I've had this debate with my kingdom and they still feel the need to go multiple races as attackers, seeing the benifits in each race/pers.

    What is the main drive behind top kingdom choosing the same attacking race?

    Simplistic?

  3. #33
    Moderator for:
    Utopia Forums
    Palem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    22,030
    Prolly less management problems.

  4. #34
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    37
    I like how this thread went from one about what races the top kds have chosen to a blast fest of twyla's race/pers choice.. some of the comment were hilarious though

  5. #35
    Forum Fanatic E_Boko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,655
    elf mystic is bad as a a/m. unless you can assume you will be stagnant in the war, incoming acres will wreck your wpa and kill your MS chances. FB is always useful though but then its just better to go sage.

    btw faery warr ftw
    Icy 4 8

  6. #36
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    noobtopia
    Posts
    1,836
    Usually because there are one or two favored races, by the game mechanics. I would ass-ume it is more evident when playing for land and nw than kingdoms that are just looking to win wars.
    Picking a core of the same race with the same advantages means that, as a kingdom, you're going to do better at that one thing than you would with a mix of races trying to compensate for each others' weaknesses. Playing to one race's advantages can work very well... you don't need to have everything at a kingdom level in moderation, like having a certain number of t/ms or hybrids or banks or humans or whatever, to balance out to averageness. Take a swarm of undead or orc attackers and you'll do fine... or take a core of humans and have money coming out of your pants. Mixing it up only blunts what your kingdom wants to do, in these examples. It's not an unbreakable rule, but the point is that you don't have to run certain kinds of provinces just because... like, you don't need to have a hybrid just to have one.

  7. #37
    I like to post Realest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,368
    Quote Originally Posted by fuzzy| View Post
    if I was still there - YES THEY WOULD OF!


    would -have- or would'-ve-
    The End of an Era

  8. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    48
    ah, its good to be back... having a real laugh at some of the posts in this thread.. :)

    I like Av/Cleric.

  9. #39
    Member |-|/-\\/[]|<'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    37
    LOL @ Furrie saying Realest is wrong about Elf/Shephard...

    wait...smells like Troll!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •