Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Not slaying dragons

  1. #1
    Post Demon lastunicorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,458

    Not slaying dragons

    During the course of a war, you might slay 3-4 dragons. If the other kingdom wants to, they can just keep sending another dragon. Is it really worth it if they're just going to keep sending more? So assume you don't slay any, it's a huge hit on income, dme/ome, and draft, but isn't it worse to lose 3 specs per acre only to have a fourth dragon hit you that gives you the same penalties in the end? How much dragon-free time is worth the cost of slaying it? In other words, if kingdom A immediately sends their specs to the dragon, how long until kingdom B (who tanked their dragon) has suffered the same amount?

  2. #2
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    noobtopia
    Posts
    1,836
    Only if you can keep a dragon on your opponent does it work out for you in the end. It may make mathematical sense to keep the dragon on you, but if you have a dragon on you and the enemy doesn't, over a long period that is a lot of lost soldiers and cash, let alone the dragon's worse effects. If you're in the position where the enemy can slay dragon after dragon you send and you can't slay theirs, then your economy is really crappy, which is a problem in of itself.

    It might make sense not to send a dragon under certain circumstances and train more army, and forget about slaying, but those situations are not common.

  3. #3
    Post Demon lastunicorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,458
    The reason I bring this up is because it took us 2 days to slay a dragon, and when we finally did they already had the next dragon funded. Seems like we could have tanked the first dragon and just been better off in that scenario.

  4. #4
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    281
    it allows enemy KD to begin retraining/building acres/pumping up if you dont slay dragon. they can use gold instead of funding.
    its also a morale thing if enemy sees you kill a dragon in a few hours, and it helps rally your own kd.

    those may be unquantifiable but should still be considered. the answer to your particular question i don't know, but would be a good starting point to determine if kd's should slay dragons. most likely, however, the answer won't be hard and fast but situational.

  5. #5
    Moderator for:
    Utopia Forums
    Palem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    22,030
    Step one:
    Make sure they can't fund new dragon

    Step two:
    Kill dragon

  6. #6
    Strategy Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    4,201
    Quote Originally Posted by lastunicorn View Post
    The reason I bring this up is because it took us 2 days to slay a dragon, and when we finally did they already had the next dragon funded. Seems like we could have tanked the first dragon and just been better off in that scenario.
    In that case yes, it took u guys to long to kill the dragon and in that case i would just tank it. At MOST it should take your kd 12 hours to kill a dragon as every prov in the kd should log in every 12 hours in war, if you kd isnt capable of that i'd tank dragon 1 and hope that the kd you war funds dragon 2. If they do its wasted gold on their part and u guys never sent out specs to kill either dragon.

  7. #7
    Veteran jamin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    523
    Last war took us forever to slay dragon 1, while opposing kingdom had slain ours fairly quickly. Put us 1k acres behind by the time we got rid of it. We hung on for a little while before slaying it, until they thought we were going to tank it, I guess the other kingdom stopped trying to fund dragon number 2. We finally slew it, and sent our number 2 shortly after, then had number 3 ready to go. They slew number 2 pretty quickly but couldn't afford to send dragon number 2 on us (blanket riots and greed). We sent dragon 3 within an hour of them slaying our 2nd one and launched a 4th one (which we didnt fund because we knew there was no way they could slay number 3). We were dragon free for the rest of the war while they couldn't slay our sapphire. It kept their T/Ms from hurting us and we were mostly MS free for those last 2 days. It destroyed their economy entirely which allowed us to rebuild. The dragons basically won the war for us (it was a close 6 day war, but that gave us the edge).

  8. #8
    I like to post Landro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    3,616
    2 days to slay is horrible. You might as well have let it be.
    This is my province. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    My province is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life.
    My province, without me, is useless. Without my province, I am useless.
    I must attack hard with my province. I must attack harder than my enemy who is trying to pk me. I must pk him before he pk's me. I will...

  9. #9
    Post Demon lastunicorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Persain View Post
    In that case yes, it took u guys to long to kill the dragon and in that case i would just tank it. At MOST it should take your kd 12 hours to kill a dragon as every prov in the kd should log in every 12 hours in war, if you kd isnt capable of that i'd tank dragon 1 and hope that the kd you war funds dragon 2. If they do its wasted gold on their part and u guys never sent out specs to kill either dragon.
    This is what I'm getting at. You think that if it takes >12 hours to slay, tank it. What about the case where it takes 3 hours to slay, but they already have the second dragon funded and you can't slay the second one within 12 hours? What if you can slay the second one in 5 hours, but they hit you with a third one that you absolutely can't slay? Would it have been better to tank the first one? Obviously Palem's right, and if you can stop them from funding the next dragon, do it before slaying. There are however, times when this is easier said than done, especially if they are determined to put 80% of their income into the next dragon.

  10. #10
    Veteran jamin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    523
    It also depends on what dragon they're sending. I mean if you have a ruby on you and they're sending a gold as the next one, you have to ask yourself, which can you afford to take the most. It clearly depends on the status of your provinces at the time. If you're in a good economical state and want to keep it that way, and you've decided that you're *definitely* going to tank one of the dragons, then tank the ruby.

  11. #11
    I like to post KuhaN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    tracy, california
    Posts
    4,732
    If youre not killing their econ then dont bother killing your dragon.

    And listen to Palem's two step advice, genius!
    "Go back to the gym because you f'king suck at utopia, noob." -Godly



    My classic black theme for Utopia - Updated 5/13/15

    Quote Originally Posted by darkl1ght View Post
    Unfortunately, no amount of razes will improve your war record
    Greatest strategy thread/question of all-time.

  12. #12
    I like to post KuhaN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    tracy, california
    Posts
    4,732
    To answer ur further questions, if u think theyre going to be funding their dragons super quick, then dont kill dragon.

    Palem's two step answer still applies.
    "Go back to the gym because you f'king suck at utopia, noob." -Godly



    My classic black theme for Utopia - Updated 5/13/15

    Quote Originally Posted by darkl1ght View Post
    Unfortunately, no amount of razes will improve your war record
    Greatest strategy thread/question of all-time.

  13. #13
    Post Demon lastunicorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,458
    Thanks for all the input

  14. #14
    Forum Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,014
    The only way you would know that they could fund it that quickly if you killed it within 5 hours is 1)if you see in the intel that they have very large stockpiles of gold, or 2) there are quite a few of them with very stron econs(humans, merchant, people with high peasents/banks, ect.), and they would all log in every tick and dump their GC in. Although even there 5 hours is fairly fast in a war at the level I am guessing you are warring.

    In the case of 1, you should steal that gold, in the case of 2 you should incapacitate their econs. If there are so many in 2 that you cannot do that(like the whole KD), then you should still try slowly, or else long term you will have problems, although chances are you have other advantages.

    Either way, if people are consistently getting 3-4 dragons on you, while it takes you 2 days to kill them, chances are you are having more general problems in your wars.

  15. #15
    Post Demon lastunicorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Topsy View Post
    Although even there 5 hours is fairly fast in a war at the level I am guessing you are warring.
    It was actually started and funded in the same tick, presumably by their monster of a monarch. We might need to start the ops on him soon.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •