Balance of Powers

[hllwrld]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance...onal_relations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realism...l_relations%29

I think these two links in their present state are... well, to me they are interesting. I skimmed them for a few seconds and have a mere mortal's conception of them from past knowledge.
I brought them up because I couldn't come up with a topic name for the following:


Division of labor.

Division of labor ~ division of logic?

Or should I think of 'division of logic' as separate? (I thought of this recently and hadn't checked if such has already been described or ...whatever)

Finally, division of logic causing faith and subsequent evolution/co-evolution of both.


Edit; append:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse

[clan tino]

there is a problem about logic in the first place. Aristotelian Logic is not enough to explain the world. It is a limited interpretation and biased by a true false attribute.]

Tino o logico da tijuca

[freemehul]

there is a problem about logic in the first place. Aristotelian Logic is not enough to explain the world. It is a limited interpretation and biased by a true false attribute.]

fortunately there are other kinds of logic, but indeed again not enough to explain the world. Bottomline is you can't go without experience. The experience is often an inherent lack of an equilibrium, but despite of that I find it that realism remains very interesting, especially for game theory.