zauper i don't want to get into arguments here, but you know why i said i would order razes back if CR tried taking "tax'ed" acres, to allow us to fight pewpew. (Numours times your leadership was told to deal with me, instead you guys went behind my back and made a deal with an inactive Boss), Yes he agreed to the deal of giving acres, but i had told before i did not agree to such things, yet CR went behind my back to make a deal?
You also know that it was admitted that you dealbroke legacy early age. (Maximouse claiming he admitted it because he didnt have all facts at the time...Since when does Maximouse not have all facts before making such statements?)
And the deal topsy made us with atleast 24hrs notice and rest to be agreed upon.. you guys claimed wasnt a deal as we hadnt gotten confirmation by all 3 in your leadership? (So in that case why was your deal for "tax" acres a proper deal when you only had agreement with 1 half of the leadership, the inactive one at that, despite being told to deal with me).
Anyway ive said my piece on this.
gl CR and GL Legacy players.
As the acres was called "tax" by CR leadership, whats wrong in quoting the term Ben? I was told to not see it as "tax" bt to see it as allowing legacy a fight without being at a disadvantage, yet CR called it "tax" on first approach. (and on forums if im not mistaken).
I apologise if you feel offended Benjamin as that is not my intention.