man you have all the answers!
this topic is now about simians.
*flashes the Anri-signal*
My apologies, but we really should be talking about "aehtaksawesomeselfies. Nuff said....
love that thick mahogany back with no belly carve or anything...pure thick wood ! The thing ROCK is made of !
________
Weed bowls
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...+say&FORM=VDRE
Ben, just let them. Waving the KD closest to us that we dont have a CF with while even still under a dragon from legacy is considered running now...:).
DJ is right ofcourse. We shouldnt wave the KD closest to our size while we dont have a CF. Especialy when they are bringing up banks which would be used later to gain an advantage over us.
Even if pyro wanted to declare CR, they couldnt. All that talk about exploring to a somewhat competitive build to at least have a fight worth fighting.
In my own comfort ghetto
PyroManiaCs (retired)
AC (retired)
What I have to ask is, why would CR bother?
Lets be frank about this. The top kingdoms get to choose who will and who won't be able to even compete for a crown in most circumstances by either being open to Cfs or closed to them. If three of the top 5 have CFs and the other two do not, then the other two are food for each other and for the other three. The other three merely need worry about the two non-cfd. So pyro and CR growing would be the two who are out. There is no point.
Perhaps I am just a burnout..... no wait, I think I AM a burnout, but in all honesty I can think of nothing that seems more pointless, unfun or more of a waste of time than growing up just to be food for BB/AMA/P2. They can just have relaxing fun testing the warring skills of the war kds that always maintain that on even acres they could compete with CR et al. So everyone in the low top ten to mid teens gets their wish, they get to test themselves against last age's crown winner. Thats nice, and its fun. so leave them alone and let them war.
+1.If they want to war they owe the tax man.
How long will you be too much of a coward to use your real username?
It's against fair play to reengage someone at a later point in the round (or even back to back)? Interesting, hadn't heard this one in a long time. We had a beef with BB for their re engagement because flogger said something along the lines of "consider it a deal" then the next day retracted that after we had already setup for pump build.Originally Posted by DonJuan
Last edited by Godly; 09-04-2014 at 17:24.
"Godly, you do realized that you have just sealed your faith now, right?"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)