Power Rankings Age 63

[Palem]

New halfer surpasses Faery.

Nothing surpasses faery!

[Andurilas]

This assumes constants for every race, including 3 raw TPA and WPA, and a home defense of 30 dpa. Also, every race is optimized in its elite/spec configuration except Undead, which I capped at about 50% elites. Undead Warrior with optimized Elites would send 112.92, 4.8mWPA and 5.72 mTPA.


OPA on Send___mWPA___mTPA

1. HU/WA___111.44___4.8 ___5.74
2. OR/WA___108.42___4.62___5.5
3. UD/WA___104.88___4.8 ___5.72
4. HU/SA___103.18___5.34___6.43
5. OR/SA___103.11___5.11___6.11
6. UD/SA___98.58___5.34___6.41
7. DW/SA ___98.25___4.8___5.96
8. AV/WA___95.11___4.8___5.72
9. DW/SA___93.8 ___5.34___6.67
10. AV/SA___89.66___5.34___6.41
11. EL/WA___86.5___6.24___5.72
12. EL/SA___82.41___6.94___6.41
13. HA/WA___52.6___4.8___9.92
14. HA/SA___49.97___5.34___11.15
15. HA/RO___47.82___4.8___12.71

[noobium]

These rankings are also mostly irrelevant even in the limited scope they cover, because milscience can vary wildly;
besides, having a free-frame is only relevant for that one period where they are perfectly pumped, and says nothing about how the perform as a result of being hit/opped, their likely chance of dodging ops, and various other factors. You really can only rate individual troops and how they are likely to be arranged, for instance dwarves are likely to go heavy on elites (but not as heavy as last age, where you could realistically expect 4:1 elites:defspec on some dwarves).

[Andurilas]

That's all true. This has no way of accounting for attack speed, casualties, or army composition. It's just another metric to use as a data point in comparing options. If you see that optimized potential between two combos is close, you can intuition/guesstimate the deviation for using cleric, tact, etc.