Re: palem

[Pillz]

It is about time you stand up for youself and learn where the attack button is. Good for you, figuring out how to play Utopia like a grown up.

Now if only you didn't insist on using the same ****play tactics you have condemned others for over the years. And perhaps it would be nice if you didn't, as the games only non-paid forum staff, smear **** all over the communities last gathering place and toss your usertag around like it meant something.

But I suppose once a ghetto rat always a ghetto rat.

[Spahrep]

In before ban.

[Pillz]

Of course he's going to ban me for calling him out on ****play in-game and his lack of professionalism on the forums.

[Zantetsuken]

Of course he's going to ban me for calling him out on ****play in-game and his lack of professionalism on the forums.

Bans are currently being handed out for a different reason that I'm afraid to mention for fear of being banned myself lol.

[Spahrep]

"as the games only <forbidden topic in relation to his in game play>"
Thats the line that brings the ban my friend.

[Pillz]

Is that reason erratic and destructive behavior by the forum's moderator, directed at a long-standing and respected member of the community?

[Avenger]

Forum crown to Palem.

[Palem]

1. Why does this need it's own thread?
2. When I have condemned razes in war? The only thing I can remember condemning are stupid gangbangs that are initiated for bull**** reasons to hide the fact that people are joining together to eliminate a kingdom they don't want to compete against.
3. Your opinions on my playing:

[Pillz]

"as the games only <forbidden topic in relation to his in game play>"
Thats the line that brings the ban my friend.

I see, so the problem is that players are somehow supposed to separate the desplicible ingame actions of the moderator from his forum posts (as moderator) which reinforce and support those acts?

As mentioned elsewhere on these forums, Palem should do the responsible thing and remove his personal quarrel from the forums and onto IRC (should he desire an audiance), or limit them to ingame communications. Otherwise he is merely inviting criticism regarding his position as moderator.

[Palem]

We're done discussing my position as a moderator.

Cool?
Cool.

[Spahrep]

I see, so the problem is that players are somehow supposed to separate the desplicible ingame actions of the moderator from his forum posts (as moderator) which reinforce and support those acts?

As mentioned elsewhere on these forums, Palem should do the responsible thing and remove his personal quarrel from the forums and onto IRC (should he desire an audiance), or limit them to ingame communications. Otherwise he is merely inviting criticism regarding his position as moderator.

http://forums.utopia-game.com/showth...1#post15319940

[Avenger]

That's inevitable.

[Pillz]

1. Why does this need it's own thread?
2. When I have condemned razes in war? The only thing I can remember condemning are stupid gangbangs that are initiated for bull**** reasons to hide the fact that people are joining together to eliminate a kingdom they don't want to compete against.
3. Your opinions on my playing:

1. I'm not taking part in discussions relating directly to you and FREE. This thread is regarding your own actions, growth as a player, and the controversy surrounding your ill conceived forum campaign.
2. So you are saying that everybody should chose to raze into wars arbitrarily? Thats funny I dont recall you holding that stance previously.

[Pillz]

Your position as a moderator isn't the thing under discussion. It is the way in which you conduct yourself on these forums in relation to your position as moderator.

[Spahrep]

Your position as a moderator isn't the thing under discussion. It is the way in which you conduct yourself on these forums in relation to your position as moderator.