wSk notices Fluffylicious (72h)

[protector]

And if you think 1.4billion i think your mistaken Prot

You had 1175k peasants on 104k acres. You have 25 * ToG. If I assume 25% banks on 104k acres with 2% income bonus from Lord (you've got 10 Lords, rest are higher) and 10% alchemy science, you'd make over a billion in 144h. I didn't calculate wages (they don't make a huge difference when you have likely 50% wages on 11ppa) or science (which I said I didn't include)
So if you have 440m and add a billion plus to that in 144h, you'd get to 1.4b :p
Of course you didn't run no science, but it doesn't change the fact that you could be ready for a full pump easily and still have ran a solid amount of science during those 144h.

Theories about being provocative? lol it wouldnt include you telling me about morals then supporting Pyro doubling ED right?

I only said I can guess why you noticed into EOWCF rather than waiting 11 hours until they exit. Given the response I get now, might not be so wrong :p
And when and were did I support Pyro's double on ED? I don't recall I have nor would I want to do so.

[Korp]

And when and were did I support Pyro's double on ED? I don't recall I have nor would I want to do so.

By not actioning it, you support it this kind of foul play obviously.

[protector]

By not actioning it, you support it this kind of foul play obviously.

So now everyone not actioning any form of foul play is supporting it? Mmmkay, noted.

[Korp]

So now everyone not actioning any form of foul play is supporting it? Mmmkay, noted.

When you stand up for "****play" In one moment then disregard it the other moment when there is no longer any benefit for you it is like that. :)

[bounceOS]

Haven't you been playing in a ghetto?

for the past ..i think 7-8-9 ages yes ..and it's way much nicer and more quiet down here , but before that i did play up there ...when abs was still around , the real abs , not this

[Aranfein]

Prot by paying what Pyro owed ED for double hostiling, yes you approved of it, Pyro did not get sanctioned for their actions as they should have, it was ****play at best hitting into a full blown hostile, from your own alliance KD, I could understand if it was a random and you had your hands full that you cant oversee everything, but we are talking one of your closest allies and you sat by doing nothing to sanction the ****play that included 2 of your allied/alliance Kingdoms.. (i'll stick to my previous statement of you being hypocritical in regards to this), we always got along before this age, but ever since the punishment on Emeriti, yourself and your alliance has given me a bad taste, which is a shame...

Also apparently someone from BB "adviced" Pyro to do so no? on top of that you knew about it because it was spoken about, why didnt you stop it before it happened? (sounds a bit like Emeriti this?) (saw thread that said it had been adviced so if thats true you knew...).

Not even going to discuss our gc with you, if you bothered checking intel you would know we dont have that amount.

If your theory in me noticing Panda early included me wanting war with them, rather then WsK then yes you are correct, if not then you are mistaken, I had set the CFs like that..Panda was more our size, and i did try negotiate with WsK to give a bit more time/let us get a bit closer, which again they were fine to reject they wanted to win too so i understand they prefered keeping all advantages, i think anyone does.
I tried to extend with both WsK and Panda but both refused so not much i can do about that other then go to war, seeing they were both intitled to decline my request.

WsK is a good strong kingdom and i still think they can sneak in and win the age, their CFs just need be stacked a bit better, but they have improved a lot.

[stefan192]

Panda will war Fluffy with no interference from wSk. End of story.

[protector]

When you stand up for "****play" In one moment then disregard it the other moment when there is no longer any benefit for you it is like that. :)

We didn't disregard it. We didn't now either. And we don't benefit from any of it.

[Judge]

When you stand up for "****play" In one moment then disregard it the other moment when there is no longer any benefit for you it is like that. :)

Told that multiple times, They stand for ****play by them. They stand for ****play against them!

[Judge]

We didn't disregard it. We didn't now either. And we don't benefit from any of it.

Your alliance members did!

[scheffie]

We didn't disregard it. We didn't now either. And we don't benefit from any of it.

You called your alliance the "FEYR PLAY alliance". All of your leaders formed this group to punish Emeriti for the ****plays ABS made in the past. Dont discuss their correlation now plz. This group/alliance might be formed with a beneficial cause -> end the ****plays. But since you guys won, it gave u a big power position. So when 1 or more of these members (pyro clearly did) are pulling out a big ****play. Why arent the other leaders standing up again to punish them? Why arent they taking any form of responsibility? You guys pretended to be the fair players of the game. So i agree that BB sticked to their word. Didnt expected that, but compliments to that. Yet, if you truly believe in fair play you should never backup ****plays.

Flogger, big compliment on immediatly stating that when WSK is ****playing this notice, you will act.

I guess you guys all understand there is a big loop on these KDs now to see whether they stick to their word :). Good luck with that.

[Korp]

We didn't disregard it. We didn't now either. And we don't benefit from any of it.

How can flogger try to solve the situation if you at the same time didn't know? Also when you found why not punish Pyro they are you "allies" after in the name of "feyr play"

[protector]

Prot by paying what Pyro owed ED for double hostiling, yes you approved of it, Pyro did not get sanctioned for their actions as they should have, it was ****play at best hitting into a full blown hostile, from your own alliance KD.

Ugh. Flogger asked what ED wanted, we gave them this. Approval my ass. You sound more and more like ASF. We don't approve of double hostiles, end of story.

Also apparently someone from BB "adviced" Pyro to do so no? on top of that you knew about it because it was spoken about, why didnt you stop it before it happened? (sounds a bit like Emeriti this?) (saw thread that said it had been adviced so if thats true you knew...)

I'm not sure why you bring this up again when it has already been answered and when you've already read the answers. It does make sense if my theory is correct though! :P

Not even going to discuss our gc with you, if you bothered checking intel you would know we dont have that amount.

See, that's the problem. I write something, you read it as something you want to read rather than what's actually written. You HAD 440m 144h ago, you COULD have had ~1.4bil
Of course you do not have 1.4bil GC now because you blew a portion of it on science. Whatever amount of GC you have less went to exploring (shouldn't be that much as exploring at those sizes is cheap) or science. Is that so illogical? :p

If your theory in me noticing Panda early included me wanting war with them, rather then WsK then yes you are correct, if not then you are mistaken

Not my theory, no.

[protector]

All of your leaders formed this group to punish Emeriti for the ****plays ABS made in the past.

Wrong. We started this because of what dorje/leshrak/bourreau & co did.

How can flogger try to solve the situation if you at the same time didn't know? Also when you found why not punish Pyro they are you "allies" after in the name of "feyr play"

I suppose cause he jumped in the moment he found out? And he didn't until it already happened?

[Meep]

You trolls like lampost, meep etc can crawl back into your caves. This isn't an act supported by BB, in fact we're against.

Not a troll here, Just someone finding it amusing that your allies from the awar seem to think that winning means they can all dealbreak and powerplay for the rest of the age and get away with it.