Pandamonium

[Meep]

Protip for Pandas: You should probably find a way to squeeze out a response from them soon, because a one-way hostile is not a hostile for long

[Anri]

That KD aimed to ruin the age for Pandas from OOP. It took them several days to agree to CF Pandas cause they thought we were lying when we said who we were. They said we are CR and thus wanted to screw our age. And it worked. Now ppl are saying we dont have the right to get our revenge because there is a hostile code. I think this code was broken the moment they refused to give a CF and was determined to slow Pandas (CR) and ruin the age for the KD. By the time Pandas got the CF they asked for it was to late, the rest of the top was 10-15k acres ahead and all ready CFing each other and leaving Pandas out of the party, instead we became the smaller KD that would need to fight every step of the way to even make any CFs in the top. THEY targeted us to screw our age, we did not target them. The devs kicked us into war with them and ended the war before we even had the chance to fight back for real. They kept hostile us for many days after this untill it became clear to them that we were not CR. We have the right to hostile them and get our revenge.

Now after X amount of weeks of fighting to get even remotly close to the rest of the top this KD The U is going to tell us what is a hostile and what is not a hostile. We have every reason in the world to ruin the KD we just waved. We 129k acres and them 107k acres and not in a CF to us. We were waiting for them to keep growing and they did. Now they should pay the price for ending our age plans week 1. I couldnt care less what the rest of the top thinks about this and what constitutes a hostile or not. If The U feel like double hostile us and interfere in our grudge then so be it. They also need to live by the consequences for such actions this age and next age. But its a free world. We cant stop them, we only hope they make the right call.

[TheRealKremlin]

That KD aimed to ruin the age for Pandas from OOP. It took them several days to agree to CF Pandas cause they thought we were lying when we said who we were. They said we are CR and thus wanted to screw our age. And it worked. Now ppl are saying we dont have the right to get our revenge because there is a hostile code. I think this code was broken the moment they refused to give a CF and was determined to slow Pandas (CR) and ruin the age for the KD. By the time Pandas got the CF they asked for it was to late, the rest of the top was 10-15k acres ahead and all ready CFing each other and leaving Pandas out of the party, instead we became the smaller KD that would need to fight every step of the way to even make any CFs in the top. THEY targeted us to screw our age, we did not target them. The devs kicked us into war with them and ended the war before we even had the chance to fight back for real. They kept hostile us for many days after this untill it became clear to them that we were not CR. We have the right to hostile them and get our revenge.

Now after X amount of weeks of fighting to get even remotly close to the rest of the top this KD The U is going to tell us what is a hostile and what is not a hostile. We have every reason in the world to ruin the KD we just waved. We 129k acres and them 107k acres and not in a CF to us. We were waiting for them to keep growing and they did. Now they should pay the price for ending our age plans week 1. I couldnt care less what the rest of the top thinks about this and what constitutes a hostile or not. If The U feel like double hostile us and interfere in our grudge then so be it. They also need to live by the consequences for such actions this age and next age. But its a free world. We cant stop them, we only hope they make the right call.

We got no problem with you going after xxxx Anri -- but we also have a right to notice you and attempt to war or take acres (we noticed before any hostilities). We offered you a fair deal for an EoA if that is the route you wanted to go and were turned down. That's fine.

We won't interfere with any legit hostilities, however completely one-sided hostiles aren't legit as has already been gone over a bunch (tons of examples) -- we had a similar situation earlier this age when we were on the receiving end.

[Anri]

We got no problem with you going after **:** Anri -- but we also have a right to notice you and attempt to war or take acres (we noticed before any hostilities). We offered you a fair deal for an EoA if that is the route you wanted to go and were turned down. That's fine.

We won't interfere with any legit hostilities, however completely one-sided hostiles aren't legit as has already been gone over a bunch (tons of examples) -- we had a similar situation earlier this age when we were on the receiving end.

When you coordinate with said KD and tell them to fort up, tell them to not retal and so forth it feels coordinated attempt to screw us. Meanwhile i explained above that this is no normal situation. I can clearly see that you intend to hit, while we ofc do not think this is ok at all. We can have a war if that is what you want to have, you just let us finish this. It shouldnt take that long. You give us this time and you have 100% war. If you choose to not deal with us and not setup a war and instead take the greedy path then i am quite sure it will greatly damage your KD in the future. But that is your own call. I prefer the way where both kds get happy about warring each other.