And here i thought it was just another smear tactic from one of HRC's 'media buddies'.
And here i thought it was just another smear tactic from one of HRC's 'media buddies'.
I'm confused. If Trump has done nothing wrong what did Bill do wrong?
I don't recall any 13 year olds accusing Bill of raping them...¯\_(ツ)_/¯
If you're talking about the Epstein thing, Bill Clinton and Trump both are involved in that disgusting business. We really don't have a choice this cycle.
This is just Trump saying some mean words. If calling Mexicans rapists didn't faze people, this shouldn't.
The GOP withdrawing support was just a matter of time. They're not going to go down with the Trump ship, but they had to wait until the final stretch for their withdrawal of support to do maximum damage. I don't think the GOP wants to win this cycle, because they know whoever wins in 2016 inherits a ****storm of a country. Better for them to let Clinton win, who has promised to run the country on neocon principles anyway, and have her take the blame when **** hits the fan.
I'll repeat - Clinton and her bought-and-paid-for MSM just need something to distract from wikileaks. They may cover the airwaves, but the internet is far more interested in her campaign leaks. Unfortunately the few undecided voters left are the really low-info ones, the ones who are going to vote for the last person who told them what to do.
Last edited by noobium; 09-10-2016 at 23:40.
Europeans must understand that through some strange twist of actually idiocy or conspiracy we can now stand in line and vote for something that doesn't matter. Don't be smug, you'll be lowering wages soon yourselves. We have an election where staying home might be more patriotic than voting. Luckily I voted Stein last election so my armor is clean. I'm not a communist by the way and have voted libertarian in the past. I'm savvy enough to understand a bias representative in the White House will be balanced due to political attrition.
My conspiracy projections see a move toward a military government. You see, I get use to observing happenstance news and entertainment interlocking as media tightens its grip. That doesn't make me a republican, so hold on. It's when the thing about people not standing for the national anthem became a thing. The test shot was groups of veterans saying they didn't object because it is their choice and the choice they fought for. Now, that's pretty cozy and addresses several complaints. In other words, while I deem this to be true it's the fact that it has media traction that makes me suspicious.
The US has operated on a lot of false friction and suddenly we have balance from the veteran perspective. I know a lot of veterans and I know this voice is true, but it's not been publicized. My point is that it's not the grunts that would be in charge. It's the machine that has invoked refugee populations on our first world neighbors.
Trump(and Clinton) are perfectly terrible enough to give cause to formulaic paradigm: a third option. 99 out of 100 conspiracy theories can be wrong. We can't afford to sleep on the real ones.
If your curious about who's running the country just watch a 60 Minutes episode about raising political dollars. You don't need to watch it to figure out 'not these people'.
love that thick mahogany back with no belly carve or anything...pure thick wood ! The thing ROCK is made of !
________
Weed bowls
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...+say&FORM=VDRE
At this point it shouldn't be a surprise, and people voting for him already would have been like "Yeah I could see him saying that", and nothing changes. As noobium stated, just a clever deflection from having to discuss the wikileaks at length.
The hilarious thing about this grab the pussy **** is that everyone knows DC political elites engage in this sort of behavior all of the time. Power is the greatest aphrodesiac, as Hillary Clinton's mentor said.
Gotta get one thing through your head... NO ONE is going to outlaw abortion. Republicans and Democrats both want population control.
All ya'all should've voted Ron Paul when you had the chance!
Lolol without his consent, he can sue her if he has the monies.
Edit: he is talking abt the specific woman being someone who wouldnt mind btw, i have seen plenty of trump trolls purpertuating the story over at youtube. Then again you =/= me or anyone else, strange to assume everyone else have to take the moral lowbar and accept that behaviour as faultless. Lololol.
Last edited by Nanka; 12-10-2016 at 13:52.
If being famous is consent to touch anyone then Bill Clinton did nothing wrong. You can't say that rich famous men are allowed to do whatever they want to women and also say that Bill Clinton sexually abused women.
But all that's getting side tracked from the fact that your ideas on consent, women, and basic social behavior are so out of wack that I'm done with this conversation other than than to advise you to stay the hell away from women and I can only hope that you don't have any children to teach your messed up views on women to.
Support email: utopiasupport@utopia-game.com <- please use this and don't just PM me| Account Deleted/Inactive | Utopia Facebook Page |PM DavidC for test server access
If you don't grab them by their genitals, how do you get their attention?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)