Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Changes for next age

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    49

    Changes for next age

    Maybe there is a better thread for this, couldnt find it so I post it here.


    As we now cant choose between acers or honor from war win. How about this?

    50% of the acers gained from ww is devided equally on all provs in the kd
    50% is for the M to allocate, though a cap on how much a single prov can take + a time limit for when this has to be done by the M.

    It should benefit both growing and warring kds.

  2. #2
    Post Fiend Pak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    224
    +1

    Sounds good to me
    They gave Pandora a box. Prometheus begged her not to open it. She opened it. Every evil to which human flesh is heir came out of it.
    The last thing to come out of the box was HOPE.... It flew away.

    Pandora's Box aka PB

  3. #3
    Strategy Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,226
    Sounds complicated to implement and abusable to me =]

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    49
    I also urge the dev consider it to give monarch an option to distribute lands.

  5. #5
    Forum Addict Bo To's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,229
    This is for the suggestion forum. But as other mentioned - people shouldn't be allowed to relocate the land gain. It should be done automatically to avoid abuses.

  6. #6
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    381
    Quote Originally Posted by Bo To View Post
    This is for the suggestion forum. But as other mentioned - people shouldn't be allowed to relocate the land gain. It should be done automatically to avoid abuses.
    Sounds like it would be nice to have and hard to have.
    Monsters

    Fighting the world back Proudly since Age 35

    #MONSTERS


    "If you have a problem with a post then use the report button.

    24 hour ban for arguing with me. This isn't a democracy." - Bishop

  7. #7
    Forum Fanatic
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,828
    Sounds very abusable also

    Monsters

    Fighting the world back Proudly since Age 35

    #MONSTERS





  8. #8
    Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kobi's Boys
    Posts
    80
    Very abusable, should have the bring back to option for Honor or Land or if both make it so the M can choose More of one or less of one.

    There are times when gianing so much land from a War and a WW are not helpful
    Zinc

    Kobi and his boys together since age 50

  9. #9
    Strategy Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,226
    But why is gaining land not helpful? Perhaps the 'why' is the thing that needs to be addressed.

  10. #10
    Forum Fanatic
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,828
    i like it the way it is myself.That way my people cant whine if i take land when they wanted honor :)

    Monsters

    Fighting the world back Proudly since Age 35

    #MONSTERS





  11. #11
    Forum Addict Bo To's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,229
    Quote Originally Posted by AquaSeaFoam View Post
    But why is gaining land not helpful? Perhaps the 'why' is the thing that needs to be addressed.
    Because at the moment it's too much and you can't protect it after eowcf. WW is literally for farming whoring KDs.

  12. #12
    Forum Addict CannaWhoopazz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    'Merica!
    Posts
    1,020
    Quote Originally Posted by Bo To View Post
    Because at the moment it's too much and you can't protect it after eowcf. WW is literally for farming whoring KDs.
    The problem, from my perspective, is that war kingdoms aren't always willing to protect it. I've spent 95% of my time playing this game in warring kingdoms/ghettos. Go talk to the well established war kingdoms, they're able to defend their land against the big scary growth kingdoms. In an all out fight, the growth kingdom will win because of the land advantage of course, but it's very rare that a growth kingdom is willing to stop pumping and go full hostile with a war kingdom. There's easier land to take on this server. The only land my current kingdom has taken outside of hostiles and wars is from provinces that are in kingdoms not willing to protect their land. If you're going to let a growth kingdom take your land, they're going to keep taking it!

    If you're not in a growth kingdom OR a war kingdom, then get yourself out of that piece of **** ghetto and join one! There's plenty of unfilled warring kingdoms, plenty of kingdoms with an organized core wanting to replace their weakest players, and plenty of players sitting in ****ty kingdoms who want to play with a strong team!

    If you're just playing Utopia to play Utopia and you really enjoy the casual play, then you're going to be hit by growth kingdoms. They want your land more than you do!
    Quote Originally Posted by vines View Post
    100 is the same 1. And 1/92 just means .92.

    | Blade of Dragons Mate | Mythos | S 1 3 3 7 Y | Desolated Mythos | Pandas | Barcoloco |

  13. #13
    Forum Addict smercjd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Oviedo, FL
    Posts
    1,163
    Probably better to automatically distribute land based on size...would be easier to implement than monarch choice (example of tiny kds with huge monarchs come to mind). So if you're smaller (probably due to having been recently chained) you would get the most acres based on the war win.

    This would also be ideal for honor distribution, IMO. Typically the tiny chained attackers just get screwed...but in this distribution they would not only get the most acres of the war win acres, but also the most honor. (Or course someone slightly bigger than them shouldn't be punished for it...but some kind of percentage attribution thing).

  14. #14
    Forum Fanatic Elldallan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,018
    I think that none of the land should be open to distribution by the monarch or anybody else, but I also think that giving every province the same amount is a bad idea.
    I think that acres should be allocated according to an inverse exponential formula(smallest province gets the most) with a cap on growing 100% of your current size. If the cap triggers any excess acres that would normally be awarded to a province gets shifted to the 2nd smallest province etc until all the acres have been distributed. That way cows gets 0-1 acres and chained provinces gets most of the cake to help them get back closer to median size.
    Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day, Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

  15. #15
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    104
    They should either remove the land gains from WW's, Im all for that idea, or make the bonusses aquired from EOWCF, better, to help keeping this land, right now, the "good/top kd's" are just farming tiny kingdoms 1/3 of their size, which in my book is pretty lame..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •