@jefft: u are supposed to be the mod of this game, which implies u have to be neutral to all parties yet u act like a **** and ban me out of this chat. Grow a pair!
@jefft: u are supposed to be the mod of this game, which implies u have to be neutral to all parties yet u act like a **** and ban me out of this chat. Grow a pair!
Last edited by JeffT; 10-06-2017 at 14:32.
The forum mods (and game mods) have always gone to great lengths to emphasize the separation of forums and the game. Still, I do not condone direct cursing by anyone. Not because I personally can't stand cursing, not because it's against the rules, but because it's such an ineffective way of trolling (those that are silent cannot troll, so I guess I DO object to it because of forum regulations).
I will personally take it on me to educate Matija and Vasp so that in the future they can be more well-mannered and witty forum trolls.
For the sake of consistency I await a temp ban for Persain as well due to his post in this topic: http://forums.utopia-game.com/showth...dom-far-Larger
1. Direct curse that luckily has been replaced by $*($*, but which all the same hurts my feelings badly.
2. Direct target-sharing by claiming the situation I described involved his own Kingdom and a Kingdom formerly mine.
3. Abusing his admin duties by giving "objective" advice that merely served to further his own "subjective" goals.
Oh the irony. :)The forum mods (and game mods) have always gone to great lengths to emphasize the separation of forums and the game. Still, I do not condone direct cursing by anyone. Not because I personally can't stand cursing, not because it's against the rules, but because it's such an ineffective way of trolling (those that are silent cannot troll, so I guess I DO object to it because of forum regulations).
If you think a post is against the rules you are free to report then and they will take action if they find it against the rules.
This is rather stupid and ineffective way besides just shows that you want to troll rather than make a serious case out of it.
So case closed, it wasnt a rule break. Your objective opinions has no matter in it. But if you truly are concerned about the lack of moderatation you can always contact a moderator and voice your concern.
And there we go with the personal attacks instead of discussing the the topic. Shows the maturity level.
Case isn't closed, it was a rule break. My objective opinions do have a matter in it. I am truly concerned, not about the lack of moderation, but the influence of certain stakeholders in it. I truly hope that the new owners will solely focus on the strategic development of the game and hand over moderation to Bishop (game + forum) and Palem (forum). Regardless of incidents past I cannot say anything but that these 2 have been truly objective and not contaminated by former affiliations. I honestly see no reasons to add so many forum mods to a forum that was already well-moderated. Why would the new game owners invest energy in this when at the same time they claim they're too busy to come up with new mechanics/changes sooner than 2 days before EOA.
Also, it was not a personal attack, it was an honest question. What would you do with the extra time you had in your life if you couldn't exchange words with me out here? To make it easier for you, I'll answer the question for myself: I'd probably spend these 5-10 minutes a day on reading football news, playing FIFA17/GTA V or reading a book.
Obviously not since it wasnt actioned, you seem to be under the impression that you get to decide what the rules are. I find this sudden care about the rules fascinating when you in previous posts admit that you will teach people to more effectively break the rules.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)