Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 124

Thread: #1 vs #2 in honour Game On

  1. #61
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,404
    10 minutes are rather impressive, I'd say ½ an hour is more common.

    Chains will always happen in such a war and there is only so much you can do to counter, nothing cowardly there everyone does it.

  2. #62
    Enthusiast null's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    cant tell
    Posts
    342
    (o)(o)
    Last edited by null; 20-07-2017 at 17:58.

  3. #63
    Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    64
    Quote Originally Posted by moodypig View Post
    Are u blaming ruthless for coward tactics and no fairplay cause you dont land intel ops?
    Exactly! The fact you did not make noobs province maintain a proper tpa is cowardly and all your fault.

  4. #64
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by duckels View Post
    Exactly! The fact you did not make noobs province maintain a proper tpa is cowardly and all your fault.
    Somewhat rude even if you ask me.

  5. #65
    Enthusiast null's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    cant tell
    Posts
    342
    (o)(o)
    Last edited by null; 20-07-2017 at 17:58.

  6. #66
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    384
    Target class/pers, what TPA do you have.

  7. #67
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    42
    Just tell me who you wanted to SoM. I'll give you insider pity intel...

  8. #68
    Enthusiast null's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    cant tell
    Posts
    342
    (o)(o)
    Last edited by null; 20-07-2017 at 17:58.

  9. #69
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    384
    Only way you're failing that much intel is if you're trying to test a chain who didn't lose thieves or something. Perhaps just the worst luck. 10 tries isn't so uncommon, running decent tpa and sci on a tact for me.

  10. #70
    Enthusiast null's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    cant tell
    Posts
    342
    (o)(o)
    Last edited by null; 20-07-2017 at 17:58.

  11. #71
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    42
    i demand government intel benefits!

  12. #72
    Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    61
    You know that you guys went to pumping ur provinces out of your ears but military only , and some of our attackers were matching your T/M's in wpa/tpa value ? We just have different demands and pump styles . If you go to war , even as attacker with 2tpa or less , that is on you dont blame game mechanics
    Last edited by littlehobbit; 20-07-2017 at 09:20.

  13. #73
    Enthusiast null's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    cant tell
    Posts
    342
    (o)(o)
    Last edited by null; 20-07-2017 at 17:58.

  14. #74
    Game Support Bishop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    21,332
    Quote Originally Posted by null View Post
    I had more than 2 TPA. whatever, you just protect this nonsense, cause you are rogues, if you are in situation like we are, you would be whining here, not me. Would tell same things, that this is not logical, attacker cant get with 1/3 of full stealth a single intel. I just follow orders this war, we wil lsee how it goes, but after this war i will leave the game, dont care, tell me whatever you want, this is non-sense, attacker cant get SoM for attack. Next age you probably get tons of tanky rogues and good luck with your "blind tricky" wars, bs.
    You have low tpa. SOT is by far the easiest of all the ops, if you are blowing 40 attempts getting a sot and failing every time then you need more TPA.
    Last edited by Bishop; 20-07-2017 at 15:52.
    Support email: utopiasupport@utopia-game.com <- please use this and don't just PM me| Account Deleted/Inactive | Utopia Facebook Page | #tactics <-- click to join IRC|
    PM DavidC for test server access

  15. #75
    Enthusiast null's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    cant tell
    Posts
    342
    (o)(o)
    Last edited by null; 20-07-2017 at 17:58.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •