Page 4 of 17 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 241

Thread: BB hitting into hostile

  1. #46
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,775
    Selling the razing services of a few 22 prov ghettos.

    I'm inclined to side with emeriti here, since BB is being hypocritical as hell, but I could be swayed.

    More than happy to remove a kd from crown contention.

  2. #47
    Veteran Shockwave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    733
    Quote Originally Posted by Korp View Post
    Well if you were hitting into a active hostile. Then that would look bad on your part.
    Define active hostile. Emeriti is waving kds 60% of their size to claim "active hostile" while sitting on low draft and non-war/wave builds.

    They also did this same thing yesterday, and since they did it that makes it ok right?
    #Beastblood

    rule #12 no dutchies allowed.
    --Amendment 1.1: <3 LDP mucho much
    --Amendment 1.2: <3 chrissi
    --Amendment 1.3: snirpsner is by far the best dutchie ever. <3
    --Amendment 1.4: Prot and Darkie are OK in my book.

  3. #48
    Postaholic 13nesta13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    806
    Quote Originally Posted by Korp View Post
    Well if you were hitting into a active hostile. Then that would look bad on your part.
    Don't think you got what I meant. There were no targets in range to wave without waving into a hostile was what I meant and we would not be hitting into an active hostile when we do hit.
    PyroManiaCs Monarch #Pyromaniacs

  4. #49
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,775
    Follow your own standards you use when threatening and gbing others, or I can assure you an early exit from the crown race.

    This applies to everyone who participated in the GB last age.

    You were warned last age.

  5. #50
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,775
    Quote Originally Posted by Shockwave View Post
    Define active hostile. Emeriti is waving kds 60% of their size to claim "active hostile" while sitting on low draft and non-war/wave builds.

    They also did this same thing yesterday, and since they did it that makes it ok right?
    And you backed that definition of hostile with barco last age because it would help you crown and get you out of being farmed by us.

    Think before you GB.

  6. #51
    Forum Fanatic Binar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Nubway
    Posts
    2,049
    Quote Originally Posted by Shockwave View Post
    Define active hostile. Emeriti is waving kds 60% of their size to claim "active hostile" while sitting on low draft and non-war/wave builds.

    They also did this same thing yesterday, and since they did it that makes it ok right?
    Thats a blatant lie. They were both in war/declare range, and thats more then we can say about Your kd and mine
    Last edited by Binar; 05-09-2017 at 18:03.
    Snakes
    PewPEW
    Divinity
    Emeriti

    Non of my nubs speak for my KD

  7. #52
    Forum Addict Shai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,268
    Quote Originally Posted by 13nesta13 View Post
    You didn't even give them the chance to hit. Emeriti troops went out, you went in the next minute. And they're now mod hit. And you expect ghettos to be stupid enough to hit and waste meter points on a mod hit? Or are you influencing a hostile where they can no longer retal those 3 provinces profitably and have to hit down the kd, which is exactly what they did.

    Or are you suggesting 4 19 doesn't have offense to hurt a 2.8k undead troops out?
    Im saying that 4:19 had no intention to fight 2:9 as their ingame messages to Binar on the 22nd showed, and that Sleepy making 3 hits on 2:9 on the 22nd (an hour after the wave started, not "the next minute" and they had troops home and an hour to retal so we didnt prevent them from anything) didnt change anything.

    You on the other hand seem to be saying that Sleepy hitting 3 provinces in Emeriti on the 22nd caused 4:19 to go from "lets retal the **** out of these mofos" to sending an ingame CF on the 22nd and hitting 3 other kds (2:1 on the 22nd 1:5 on the 23rd and 7:15 on the 1st).

    Now that is just silly
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

  8. #53
    Veteran Shockwave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    733
    They also hit into active hostile yesterday meep. So that negates that. Pay attention.
    #Beastblood

    rule #12 no dutchies allowed.
    --Amendment 1.1: <3 LDP mucho much
    --Amendment 1.2: <3 chrissi
    --Amendment 1.3: snirpsner is by far the best dutchie ever. <3
    --Amendment 1.4: Prot and Darkie are OK in my book.

  9. #54
    Forum Addict Shai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,268
    Quote Originally Posted by Meep View Post
    Selling the razing services of a few 22 prov ghettos.

    I'm inclined to side with emeriti here, since BB is being hypocritical as hell, but I could be swayed.

    More than happy to remove a kd from crown contention.

    lol you dont have to. BB is doing a very good job of removing themselves :)
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

  10. #55
    I like to post
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    4,531
    Quote Originally Posted by Meep View Post
    And you backed that definition of hostile with barco last age because it would help you crown and get you out of being farmed by us.

    Think before you GB.
    I agree BB play last age was very lame. Im not sure CR was any better so far.
    Personally i think last age no one deserve to be n1 and no one must be in chart.
    “the mystery of life isn’t a problem to solve, but a reality to experience.”
    ― Frank Herbert, Dune

    “I should've suspected trouble when the coffee failed to arrive.”
    ― Frank Herbert, Dune

  11. #56
    Dear Friend Korp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8,837
    Quote Originally Posted by Shockwave View Post
    Define active hostile. Emeriti is waving kds 60% of their size to claim "active hostile" while sitting on low draft and non-war/wave builds.

    They also did this same thing yesterday, and since they did it that makes it ok right?
    Its like you just selectively reads posts and then respond to them.


    Quote Originally Posted by Meep View Post
    Follow your own standards you use when threatening and gbing others, or I can assure you an early exit from the crown race.

    This applies to everyone who participated in the GB last age.

    You were warned last age.
    You need some salve for that butthurtness? Why you trying so hard to bring up last age? Not enough attention this age for you? Feeling alone?

  12. #57
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    384
    Meep, refresh my memory here if I'm wrong.... Barco noticed you into what they deemed 'non hostile' and you broke CF and waved them.

    Exactly what definition of hostile did you think we backed here ? Pretty sure we backed a 'don't deal break' stance rather than trying to define what a hostile is ?
    The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must

    Dementia - Old School - BeastBlood - BlameMod

  13. #58
    Dear Friend Korp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8,837
    Quote Originally Posted by Shai View Post
    Im saying that 4:19 had no intention to fight 2:9 as their ingame messages to Binar on the 22nd showed, and that Sleepy making 3 hits on 2:9 on the 22nd (an hour after the wave started, not "the next minute" and they had troops home and an hour to retal so we didnt prevent them from anything) didnt change anything.

    You on the other hand seem to be saying that Sleepy hitting 3 provinces in Emeriti on the 22nd caused 4:19 to go from "lets retal the **** out of these mofos" to sending an ingame CF on the 22nd and hitting 3 other kds (2:1 on the 22nd 1:5 on the 23rd and 7:15 on the 1st).

    Now that is just silly
    They were hitting 2:1 before 2:9 were hitting them. 8 hits from 4:19 towards 2:1 before 2:9 jumped in. Ofc they werent planning on intention of fighting 2:9 cause they were already in a hostile with 2:1.

  14. #59
    Postaholic
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    956
    Quote Originally Posted by astron View Post
    Meep, refresh my memory here if I'm wrong.... Barco noticed you into what they deemed 'non hostile' and you broke CF and waved them.

    Exactly what definition of hostile did you think we backed here ? Pretty sure we backed a 'don't deal break' stance rather than trying to define what a hostile is ?
    Can we get back on topic please?
    #Rage

    Best FAKE Kingdom in Utopia
    AWAR Specialists
    Fair Play Alliance Cornerstone

    ***** Most number of Awar Crowns - 5 *****

  15. #60
    Forum Addict Shai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,268
    Quote Originally Posted by astron View Post
    Meep, refresh my memory here if I'm wrong.... Barco noticed you into what they deemed 'non hostile' and you broke CF and waved them.

    Exactly what definition of hostile did you think we backed here ? Pretty sure we backed a 'don't deal break' stance rather than trying to define what a hostile is ?
    Defining a hostile definitely seem like the biggest challange for top kds these days. Smart move not to try and define one last age!
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •