Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 97

Thread: AoD exposé: Threats and coercion

  1. #61
    Postaholic
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    851
    Why would the first one be target sharing?

  2. #62
    Moderator for:
    Utopia Forums
    Palem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    22,030
    I mean....you're sharing a desired target to people. It's right there in the name, even if it's not very clever or anything lol

  3. #63
    Postaholic
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    851
    Seems pretty harmless without additional info. If I say 1:1 should attack 2:2 it's not target sharing. If I say 1:1 should attack 2:2 because 2:2 has all of the celebrity scientist names I guess it would be slightly worse.

  4. #64
    Sir Postalot Lestat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand
    Posts
    3,137
    13 KD's I heard

  5. #65
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    152
    hmmm need 25 i think

  6. #66
    Moderator umajon911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Maryland, US
    Posts
    2,045
    its almost as dumb as that BSA alliance bart tried starting up
    “The only person you are destined to become is the person you decide to be.”
    - unknown

  7. #67
    I like to post
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Utopia
    Posts
    3,932
    Quote Originally Posted by umajon911 View Post
    its almost as dumb as that BSA alliance bart tried starting up
    Tried?

  8. #68
    Needs to get out more
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Oh
    Posts
    8,976
    I random joined an AoD kingdom and it seems to be what I thought it was. Just a safety alliance.

    If I had my way I'd like to have them help me develop The Actual Kingdom(vs The Virtual). We have some good players in my kingdom but it's largely casual.

    As with anything based in passive capability it could be distorted into something of a menace. Simply put, apparently these kingdoms are happy go lucky for the most part.

    25 kingdoms would be optimal so The Actual Kingdom could have a wealth of divisional rotation.
    Last edited by StratOcastle; 19-10-2017 at 22:58.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bishop View Post
    Correct me then, instead of being a dick about it.
    love that thick mahogany back with no belly carve or anything...pure thick wood ! The thing ROCK is made of !
    ________
    Weed bowls

    http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...+say&FORM=VDRE

  9. #69
    Moderator umajon911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Maryland, US
    Posts
    2,045
    Quote Originally Posted by Bart of Sparta View Post
    Tried?
    Dont see anyone tagged... Plus we all know what it stands for. I mean...we all also know you got your hand shoved so far up other kds asses they will do what you say. Why? Still dumbfounds me. Maybe you have soft hands?
    “The only person you are destined to become is the person you decide to be.”
    - unknown

  10. #70
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    457
    Quote Originally Posted by Swagger View Post
    Seems pretty harmless without additional info. If I say 1:1 should attack 2:2 it's not target sharing. If I say 1:1 should attack 2:2 because 2:2 has all of the celebrity scientist names I guess it would be slightly worse.
    What if 1:1 asks 2:2 to hit 3:3 who 1:1 has an agrred war with but would like them to soften up 3:3 just before the agreed war begins 1:1 vs 3:3. Would u have an issue with that?

  11. #71
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    152
    3 3 surely could still take out 1:1 with current numbers... but what if 3:3 hit 2:2 to soften them up for 1:1... woah

  12. #72
    Forum Fanatic
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,010
    Why are people still positing in here. Seriously guys, it’s like chasing that hottie after 12am, ya ain’t gettin none

  13. #73
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,404
    it is just like the moon landing, some people want it not to be true that is why there is conspiracy theories all arround.

    Some people want to attribute to AoD all the worst attrocities of all the past alliances since they are the only one arround and they feel confident that if they expose them by bringing up any small thing any scrub monarch tagged AoD has ever done people will gang together to destroy this alliance which sort of gives them a hard one, either because they want to do stuff that alliance protects against, or because they want to get revenge against a long gone alliance and see them as a legitimate target in that regard.

  14. #74
    Dear Friend Korp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8,837
    AoD isn't exactly a new alliance..

  15. #75
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    587
    Quote Originally Posted by Proteus View Post
    Why are people still positing in here. Seriously guys, it’s like chasing that hottie after 12am, ya ain’t gettin none
    The chase is the fun part.
    -Nox-

    Now playing a well prepared bacon rogue. Seasoned the little piggie with peper, thyme and rosemary. Put in the oven with potatoes under it so those get baked in the seasoned fat dripping down. Asparagus with cherrytomatoes, olives and basil on the side. Hmmmmmm.

    546706 total books in Palem's superfun uhm hoi challenge.
    Made utopian faeries fly.
    Age 72 war win crown and honour crown.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •