Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 61

Thread: Hits into war

  1. #31
    Post Fiend Elixir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    131
    6:6 again? This kd is the most noob/lame bunch of players especially their LS, we agreed to have war this age and they kept stealing/plundering (with agreed war tag of course) several kd's but when one kd decided to ET their rogues and retal their hits, they immediately DB us 3 hours before agreed date..
    Last edited by Elixir; 24-01-2018 at 23:03.

  2. #32
    Forum Fanatic octobrev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    us
    Posts
    2,452
    War wins are the only resource that matters to warring kingdoms so devising a way to take those away from them is really the only effective means of retaliation. Targeting land and gc as a deterrent is kind of nonsensical.

  3. #33
    Sir Postalot Pillz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sinners NA
    Posts
    3,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Elixir View Post
    6:6 again? This kd is the most noob/lame bunch of players especially their LS, we agreed to have war this age and they kept stealing/plundering several kd's but when one kd decided to ET their rogues and retal their hits, they immediately DB us 3 hours before agreed date..
    OLawd

  4. #34
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    9
    [QUOTE=Pillz;15460871]I said I would make a province to raze you, and I have. I'm in protection for like 20 more hours and didn't want to wait to find you, nor waste stealth on 1:14 as Intel into war is a pain.

    Havenít you been paying attention, 1:14 not in war. You should be deleted

  5. #35
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ohio USA
    Posts
    133
    Quote Originally Posted by Avalawn View Post
    Yea but when WW crown on the line I would think the community would destroy them as it’s the last honorable crown there is.
    If you think 6:6 is competing for war win crown, maybe YOU havent been paying attention....
    Now I want to ask. Is there anything that the administration can do to stop the hits of "Cakey Cakey"? Since as I understand, it's unfair to attack into someone's war?
    - Some Nub

  6. #36
    Sir Postalot Pillz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sinners NA
    Posts
    3,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Avalawn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pillz View Post
    I said I would make a province to raze you, and I have. I'm in protection for like 20 more hours and didn't want to wait to find you, nor waste stealth on 1:14 as Intel into war is a pain.
    Haven’t you been paying attention, 1:14 not in war. You should be deleted
    But you are, so why waste stealth on 1:14 when I'll be getting your Intel and may need the stealth?

    Efficiency is key in Utopia. Not so efficient to repeatedly hit kds that retal before all your wars.... Or go to war during a retal war.

  7. #37
    Moderator for:
    Utopia Forums
    Palem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    21,932
    Quote Originally Posted by Jono View Post
    If you think 6:6 is competing for war win crown, maybe YOU havent been paying attention....
    Hello old friend :)

  8. #38
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ohio USA
    Posts
    133
    Quote Originally Posted by Palem View Post
    Hello old friend :)
    Its been far too long. LOL
    Now I want to ask. Is there anything that the administration can do to stop the hits of "Cakey Cakey"? Since as I understand, it's unfair to attack into someone's war?
    - Some Nub

  9. #39
    Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    64
    Quote Originally Posted by Jono View Post
    If you think 6:6 is competing for war win crown, maybe YOU havent been paying attention....
    The competition for 5th is very fierce

  10. #40
    Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    73
    Hits into a war are not ok. The person who did it made a mistake and should apologise. Threatening devastation for such a mistake is unfair and will only worsen the situation.

    If these are accepted facts, then I think a set of grownups would apologise to one another and move on. The only thing I'd have done differently (were I in 1:14) would be to not raze into the war, but make it painfully clear that any attempted/subsequent retaliation would meet with a deeply unpleasant reaction.
    But to each their own. I just would like it if we all had a little more faith in each others motives.
    Ghetto Nightmare

    Age 76 - Aversadze/Kemosabe | Age 75 - Not Your Kind Of People/Good Shot, Good Soldier | Age 74 - Godspell | Age 73 - Time Will Destroy Everything/Versions of Hate | Age 72 - Another New World | Age 71 - Cold Old Fire | Age 70 - Battlestations | Age 69 - Tilted | Age 68 - Spite & Malice | Age 67 - I, The Hand Grenade | Age 66 - The Mother We Share | Age 65 - Pretty Keen On Centrefolds | Age 64 - Wangernumb | Age 63 - Aversadze | Age 62 - Aversadze | Age 60 - Lynx | Age 59 - Astral | Age 58 - That's How You Get Ants | Age 57 - Aversadze

  11. #41
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ohio USA
    Posts
    133
    Quote Originally Posted by Calya View Post
    The only thing I'd have done differently (were I in 1:14) would be to not raze into the war, but make it painfully clear that any attempted/subsequent retaliation would meet with a deeply unpleasant reaction.
    But to each their own. I just would like it if we all had a little more faith in each others motives.
    Well sure but then you wouldn't get a fresh Forum Thread for Pillz to troll in... duh.
    Now I want to ask. Is there anything that the administration can do to stop the hits of "Cakey Cakey"? Since as I understand, it's unfair to attack into someone's war?
    - Some Nub

  12. #42
    Sir Postalot Pillz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sinners NA
    Posts
    3,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Calya View Post
    Hits into a war are not ok. The person who did it made a mistake and should apologise. Threatening devastation for such a mistake is unfair and will only worsen the situation.

    If these are accepted facts, then I think a set of grownups would apologise to one another and move on. The only thing I'd have done differently (were I in 1:14) would be to not raze into the war, but make it painfully clear that any attempted/subsequent retaliation would meet with a deeply unpleasant reaction.
    But to each their own. I just would like it if we all had a little more faith in each others motives.
    Your kingdom must be very easy pickings if you threaten people with retaliation instead of hitting them.

  13. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    38
    6:6 deserved it. They always steal and sometimes plunder under the "War agreed" tag. They also go into war without closing relations and then cry about it when they get OPs before their war. The monarch and steward also happens to be top class a holes who think they are somehow relevant or any good at this game. If you have war in a day or two, take the random hits like a man and get a CF, that way maybe you won't have to DB your agreed war.
    Last edited by Shortizz; 25-01-2018 at 03:10.

  14. #44
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    44
    Agreed. Talk like pros and sjws, but when it comes to war they somehow lose all the edge.

    Boo hoo

  15. #45
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    9
    That's not even the lamest part. 6:6 were tag war agreed, stole from someone 20% bigger than them that had the potential to ruin their war. If my king didn't cf them I would join the raze. Who said you can't hit into wars? You hit into wars cos its the worse thing you could do to someone in Utopia. If they decide to s play. This would be the best move

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •