Let's all take a moment to remember Korp was voted worst utopia troll...
Let's all take a moment to remember Korp was voted worst utopia troll...
Did I say you were right or wrong? Just bringing up the point you were voted worst troll
How is zulus behaviour any evidences of what David has said or not said? We have zulu that didnt give up on his age after this setback (which you admitted previously that you wouldnt either do you would keep going). We have zulu admitting that he talked with David, which is only natural since it was his kingdom that was involved.
And we have precedent set that this kind of behavior leads to removing from charts. Whether or not swagger thinks they will or will not be actioned doesn't matter. So who really cares, the man can have his own opinions and speculations.
So, what was the "No" answer for? I have to do better while you are totally avoiding the subject and chosing to focus your whole post on one small side track?
I guess the more interesting part is that how he came to the conclusion. "Zulu didnt give up David must have told them they wont be removed"
Last edited by Korp; 02-05-2018 at 18:05.
But how is this rule handled though, there is plenty of room for abuse in the scenario. Previously we had the clear case of Bart and Sparta, Bart being the leader of the kingdom and the one who cheated it seems a clear case, removed from the chart. But in this case it wasnt zulu that conspired to cheat with the enemy kd but players within the kingdom. You could easily screw up someones age with planting players in the kd, create a fake war and bam removed from the rankings and their age ruined. Obviously it goes the other way as well, the monarch can let some players do the dirty work, get the eowcf and still in the rankings (if now thats the case).
No, that was a honest mistake, i was convinced that you finally manned up and did give a clear answer to my intial question. My bad.
The only difference between this and Sparta is that Zulu is claiming ignorance and bart bragged about it.
If zulu isn't actioned then the moral of the story is recruit people that might ****play, but don't let them tell you about it if they do.
OK, well let's use an analogy. Let's say I enter into a marathon. My ONLY goal is to get 1st place. Anything less than 1st is absolute failure, and a waste of my time. If in the first mile, a judge runs up beside me and says "Sir, you shorts are too short, your balls are hanging out, we are going to disqualify you, but you may finish the race if you want," I am going to quit the race. If the judge runs up to me and says "Sir, your shorts are too short, your balls are hanging out, we might disqualify you, but we need to discuss it more" I am going to keep running. If the judge runs up to me and says "Sir, your shorts are too short, your balls are hanging out, but we are going to let you finish and not penalize you, also your balls are magnificent" then I am going to keep running.
As you can see, there are 3 possible outcomes, a yes or no answer cannot effectively answer a question with 3 variables.
To summarize
Yes I was actioned = Stop
Might be actioned = Keep going
Not actioned = Keep going.
Edit: I should add that by "actioned" I mean removed from rankings
Last edited by Swagger; 02-05-2018 at 18:34.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)