You were just being lazy and didnt wanna micro as many people as 24!
You were just being lazy and didnt wanna micro as many people as 24!
I take pride in my laziness. Only 8 sitting days left this age! I do think that laziness is newfound though, relatively speaking...Originally Posted by Korp
@KingTyrant Again. While I might possibly agree, seeing as I've argued for a decrease in kingdom size before, let me play devils advocate here...
If the current common is as you say, 10-16 player kingdoms, how would decreasing the size of all down to the same limit in any way create "inspiring new leaders"? Those 10-16 player kingdoms will remain as they are, leaderless and disorganised and unfit to create enthusiasm for new players. The only real difference would be that these kingdoms will now be actively competing with former 20-25 player kingdoms of much greater quality, potentially demoralising them (as has happened to war tier kingdoms every time a whoring kd decides to war in the past). And the players being cut from their former 20-25 player kingdoms have a strong incentive to retire, being sacked from their kds.
Last edited by Tadpole; 08-06-2018 at 21:10.
RoughKnecS
--> Want art? <--
--> Or see Tadpole banners? <--
The industrys greats
** Cerberus ** Killah ** Shadowheart **
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote