Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: Age 81 Proposed Changes - Feedback and Suggestions

  1. #31
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    189
    This might actually increase player base. It's a proven fact, people don't mind p2p, it's the p2w people object to. This is not p2w.

    edit: It's actually a disadvantage at the top. 100 people with a gun will wipe 50 people with 2 guns
    Last edited by Wilmington; 25-04-2019 at 19:45.

  2. #32
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    680
    Quote Originally Posted by Wilmington View Post
    This might actually increase player base. It's a proven fact, people don't mind p2p, it's the p2w people object to. This is not p2w.

    edit: It's actually a disadvantage at the top. 100 people with a gun will wipe 50 people with 2 guns
    It's a good point that there are costs to running a 13 man kingdom (more likely it will be 15-20 with sitting still used). We all know when we're sitting it can be incredibly annoying to try to do two provinces at once during a wave, and even more annoying to have to keep track of two army return times.

  3. #33
    Forum Fanatic khronosschoty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,475
    Quote Originally Posted by Andurilas View Post
    It's a good point that there are costs to running a 13 man kingdom (more likely it will be 15-20 with sitting still used). We all know when we're sitting it can be incredibly annoying to try to do two provinces at once during a wave, and even more annoying to have to keep track of two army return times.
    I disagree, hand me two provs and I'll out play 2 players each with only 1 prov. The out gun scenario doesn't apply here.
    #magi

  4. #34
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    277
    I concur that dwarves are too weak.

    I think undeads are fair now (not too weak): plague (and being plague immune) and no food are so powerful.

    Human 8/0 O spec is :O
    ex-Modesty

  5. #35
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    680
    Quote Originally Posted by khronosschoty View Post
    I disagree, hand me two provs and I'll out play 2 players each with only 1 prov. The out gun scenario doesn't apply here.
    The point isn't that SOME people can't benefit from it. There's a reason some of us like sitting to have two provinces. But there is a cost in terms of human bandwidth. Wouldn't you rather have 2 krhonosschoties if you could?

  6. #36
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    153
    you lost me at:
    - IntelBot will remain 30 credits to purchase
    - Guilds will produce more wizards

    just another gey elf age

    No thanks

  7. #37
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    462
    The networth value of dwarf elites would make more sense at 9.5. But the elite strength could stand at 6/5 if you lowered its networth value, cut the food penalty back to +50%, raise BE bonus to +25%, and give them +50% artisan science. They really need some kind of boost to keep them in the mix much. Diversity of combos is good for the game.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •