Havoc vs AMA Round 2

[John Snowstorm]

I'm not sure if this has happened before, certainly I haven't seen someone get away with it so easily. Are you trying to say since it's happened before there is already precedent so we should already have been doing this every age? I do know that you guys have openly stated that you would dealbreak and gb other kd's this age, and yet have not said anything more than "they had it coming" in most threads/channels. It's hard to openly say "as a group we gb," have eoacf's generated pre-age between 2/3 of your alliance members and SWEA, say very little publicly or in-game about this, and then expect noone to think anything of it. I'm certain none of you wish that they did it, or had anything to do with the planning of it, but by doing nothing(or even saying anything) about it you condone their actions.

The most anyone said was that what havoc did last age would be done to them, how can anyone have it coming to them more than if they did it themselves.

And yes kingdoms have profited from GBs before, I particularly remember SG gaining a lot from waving into a GB in age 45 or so (whatever age it was that pulse won land) and they took a pretty extreme lead out of it, before the got deleted en masse for xlogging. I also never said it was ok because it hpapened before.