Quote Originally Posted by Korp View Post
Me saying we werent allies actually makes it so, some random poster with no insight at all in the matter has no say in it. Even though you claim you posted "facts" Your chain of thoughts might been reasonable if it was allies then ****ed over, but it was ****ing over then allies in your head. Makes no sense at all, also shows that you dont know Anri at all. :(
That's actually not the case. Even if you had no intention of honor any of your deals, you convinced a small group of kingdoms to help you achieve your goals (unbeknownst to them). BB and Emeriti have convinced a small group of kingdoms to help them achieve their goal (with absolutely no benefit to the supporting kingdoms). You act like if you screw someone over in YR2 they can't agree to help you do something in YR12.

Also, I know Anri just fine. That's why SWEA's crown was so impressive, at least in my eyes.

Quote Originally Posted by tetley View Post
Palem, Pls see my previous post for a suggestion. I actually had hoped you would respond to it. Here is a short clip:

I think you may have missed it cause I posted it as you were typing up your post.

Now that I'm thinking about it, your question isn't even directed at the right people/there is an obvious answer to your question: That stuff from the past didn't really affect BB. That's what's different between SWEA and Emeriti. In this case, they are directly affected by the razing, so it makes complete sense for them to get involved. If you want to ask why people are making "alliances" to combat ****play now, on principled grounds, then you should be asking the non-BB kingdoms who are currently involved on BB's side...
So BB's official stance is that it's ok to ****play, as long as you don't ****play BB?