Page 8 of 17 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 242

Thread: VT2 versus Sully.

  1. #106
    Needs to get out more VT2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    10,880
    In one hour after posting the above thing, I received six messages in-game, from kings and queens who are laughing at Sully's ghettoness.

    Gee, I don't think anyone actually likes him anymore, and I don't think his kingdom will ever have another war again, either.
    Rumors spread fast, and it's going to take them around 900 years to fix their kingdom.
    Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.

    Step one: replace everything that works.
    Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
    Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
    Step four: thank you for your patience.

  2. #107
    Postaholic WolfDGrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    890
    Quote Originally Posted by VT2 View Post
    If they decide to make this less worth our time, I'll have no choice but to pay them back by making the rest of the age a living hell for them.
    That is very noobish from you VT. You both accepted the challenge, you didn't set time limits, so I'd expect that, who is in no shape to win that challenge would surrender. At this time you both can still win it, and to tell you the truth, I don't see you as the winner as the situation stands now, unless they play it very badly. It's not uncommon that good wars last for a week or two so yapping about "rest of the age" is a bit soon.

    On the "less worth of our time" that's another noobish thing. That was a public challenge for prooving one of you is better than the other, so it can't be about time, gains or anything.
    The only thing that you can talk about, is if you won or lost the war at the end. I'll consider the war won or lost when one of the kingdoms will not be able to turn the tides. As things stand now, both still can win if they are able to play their cards well.
    The fact that you talk about if it's worth or not your time, shows me that your kingdom is in deep problem, and you don't know how to say that you will surrender, so you started searching for noobie reasons for your loss.
    That will make you look like Catwalk, with his famous "Strategical Withdraw" theory. I see that, in fact it's not much of a difference between you and him then.

    Quote Originally Posted by VT2 View Post
    Congratulations - you've made me see the merits of having an auto-surrender feature added, plus a whole new war-system.
    Why? Because you didn't won in less time than your kingdom is determined enough to fight them? Well then, you lost and better withdraw, showing us that you're only the talk without the action, neither the ambition to carry out the action.
    Also, again... who are you to say they lost?

    The fact that they don't talk to you is understandable, I wouldn't talk to you either until the end of the war. Talk is cheap. Now, let's see the action.
    Utopia has to be saved! Join #strategy!

    The darkness that surrounds us cannot hurt us. It's the darkness in our own heart that we should fear!

  3. #108
    News Reporter Halfling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    182
    Sullys kd could easily win this now if they only choose right strat to follow...

  4. #109
    Needs to get out more VT2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    10,880
    Guess what, wofly? I didn't even care to read your post.

    No, halfling - they can't.
    There's now way for them to magically reverse the 5k acres they've given us to a gain for them, or take away the 250k networth we've grown, or take back the honor we've leeched from them.
    Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.

    Step one: replace everything that works.
    Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
    Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
    Step four: thank you for your patience.

  5. #110
    I like to post Catwalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Århus, Denmark
    Posts
    3,806
    Quote Originally Posted by Sweetiepie View Post
    POT calling Kettle black, ever heard of that one?
    Except Kettle's never cheated, of course.
    I don't cheat, by your own definition. We haven't used account information for personal advantage, you specifically said that anyone who runs a multi without personal gain doesn't cheat, he merely breaks the rules.

    Why do you presume to judge others and insist that your style of the playing is the only respectable one? You're rude and uninteresting.
    For Master of Magic fans:

    Quote Originally Posted by Dylan Collins, CEO of OMAC
    You should ask as many people as you can to criticise what you plan on doing.

  6. #111
    I like to post Catwalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Århus, Denmark
    Posts
    3,806
    That will make you look like Catwalk, with his famous "Strategical Withdraw" theory. I see that, in fact it's not much of a difference between you and him then.
    That isn't my theory at all. I recall Ballers being hailed as winners after withdrawing from Brute Force with sizable gains (under the old system with both surrender and withdrawal). Claiming victory in a war where you lose acres and honour is silly. It may interest you to know that we haven't done any hit'n'run for quite some time now, as it's not an interesting way to play. But the rules currently favour it.
    For Master of Magic fans:

    Quote Originally Posted by Dylan Collins, CEO of OMAC
    You should ask as many people as you can to criticise what you plan on doing.

  7. #112
    Needs to get out more VT2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    10,880
    Because our style of play is the only one that's been legal for all these years, catty, unlike yours.
    Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.

    Step one: replace everything that works.
    Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
    Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
    Step four: thank you for your patience.

  8. #113
    I like to post Catwalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Århus, Denmark
    Posts
    3,806
    No, far from it. Playing as a team and requiring players to follow orders has been legal all along.
    For Master of Magic fans:

    Quote Originally Posted by Dylan Collins, CEO of OMAC
    You should ask as many people as you can to criticise what you plan on doing.

  9. #114
    Needs to get out more VT2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    10,880
    Vietnam won the war, but it cost them a lot.

    Like a ghetto fighting someone good in this game, and the good kingdom deciding to withdraw.
    They'd have gained a lot from it, but they'd not be the official winners, since the first person who withdraws loses.
    Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.

    Step one: replace everything that works.
    Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
    Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
    Step four: thank you for your patience.

  10. #115
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    148
    me look at vt2 for next wave .... lol

    bah too small
    Kaer Loche Alliance

  11. #116
    Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    71
    Im not in any of the 2 kingdom or has an grudges against any of them . I dont know how much of a noob VT is but im sure Sully is a pretty big one. Bragging about how he can destroy VT's kingdom before it even started. He was like what? 1.3 mil bigger then them? and after how many days of war he's in dragon range? or lost like 700k NW?

    Please, true sully's kingdom can win , but because of what? Because he started out like 40% bigger then someone and decided to drag it out, not because he was superior strategticly or anything. Because he was purely bigger. They shouldnt even have to turn the tide when he was the one issue the challenging, mouthing off way before hand, had the size advantage.

    If he didnt think he lost, sully would be here mouthing off a long time ago. Him keeping silence does not mean he all of a sudden just decide not to talk. Its because he's humiliated.

    Either way , whoever WD, VT won.


    Quote Originally Posted by WolfDGrey View Post
    That is very noobish from you VT. You both accepted the challenge, you didn't set time limits, so I'd expect that, who is in no shape to win that challenge would surrender. At this time you both can still win it, and to tell you the truth, I don't see you as the winner as the situation stands now, unless they play it very badly. It's not uncommon that good wars last for a week or two so yapping about "rest of the age" is a bit soon.

    On the "less worth of our time" that's another noobish thing. That was a public challenge for prooving one of you is better than the other, so it can't be about time, gains or anything.
    The only thing that you can talk about, is if you won or lost the war at the end. I'll consider the war won or lost when one of the kingdoms will not be able to turn the tides. As things stand now, both still can win if they are able to play their cards well.
    The fact that you talk about if it's worth or not your time, shows me that your kingdom is in deep problem, and you don't know how to say that you will surrender, so you started searching for noobie reasons for your loss.
    That will make you look like Catwalk, with his famous "Strategical Withdraw" theory. I see that, in fact it's not much of a difference between you and him then.



    Why? Because you didn't won in less time than your kingdom is determined enough to fight them? Well then, you lost and better withdraw, showing us that you're only the talk without the action, neither the ambition to carry out the action.
    Also, again... who are you to say they lost?

    The fact that they don't talk to you is understandable, I wouldn't talk to you either until the end of the war. Talk is cheap. Now, let's see the action.

  12. #117
    Postaholic WolfDGrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    890
    Quote Originally Posted by VT2 View Post
    Guess what, wofly? I didn't even care to read your post.
    Lol, I don't believe that, you wouldn't be VT. It's just that you don't have reply, because you know I'm right. You wouldn't give an answer like that, if you woudn't have read it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ced View Post
    Bragging about how he can destroy VT's kingdom before it even started.
    Aye! That was noobish from Sully...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ced View Post
    He was like what? 1.3 mil bigger then them? and after how many days of war he's in dragon range? or lost like 700k NW?
    That doesn't matter. Since VT accepted the challenge, nothing like size, NW, war readyness, pumpedness or how many acres was taken in the first X days matters. None of that, neither any other thing, except only one: who destroys/owns/murders/rapes the other completely?

    When one of them will not be able to fight back, the winner will be seen.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ced View Post
    If he didnt think he lost, sully would be here mouthing off a long time ago.
    That might be true, all depends on Sully's character.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ced View Post
    Either way , whoever WD, VT won.
    That's just a big LOL. He will only truly win (and that is true for Sully's Kd too) if the others are obliterated.
    Utopia has to be saved! Join #strategy!

    The darkness that surrounds us cannot hurt us. It's the darkness in our own heart that we should fear!

  13. #118
    Postaholic
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    934
    Quote Originally Posted by VT2 View Post
    There's now way for them to magically reverse the 5k acres they've given us to a gain for them, or take away the 250k networth we've grown, or take back the honor we've leeched from them.
    its still possible. we've done it many times. sometimes its intentional to trick ppl into thinking they are winning and loot honor until they realize (i dont think this is the case here), and a few other times its due to mistakes we made earlier and we make up for them later in war

    nobody can deny that VT2 is WINNING, but he hasnt won yet, and sully's kingdom is by no means crushed. yes the rate they are weakening is far faster than VT2's kd, but because of the huge nw advantage they started out with they still have some fight left. in fact if u ONLY look at the situation now, their kd is in far better position than VT2's with several unbreakable provs and far superior nwpa on same land (they had that since the beginning of war). the only thing stopping them from winning is their own stupidity. and as unlikely as it is for them to suddenly get smart, that possibility should not be counted out

    a friendly advice to VT2 is to keep ur head cool and still take this thing seriously. also dont **** talk too much because its not time to celebrate just yet. sully made the mistake of **** talking too early and got silenced, while VT2 is right along track of the same route

  14. #119
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    436
    This is at least entertaining to keep track of while I'm collecting bonuses.

  15. #120
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    216
    we should broad cast every war VT2 has so entertaining
    Last edited by toast; 09-12-2008 at 20:03.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •