There has been no word about plans for next round in terms of game changes. I'm concerned this means that either: A) They'll do nothing B) They'll rush something through after a minimal feedback session, relying on whatever private advisors they have at the moment. Given the choice, which of the following options would you prefer? Please try to leave specific suggestions out of this thread, as that will likely bog down fast.
Minimal
Reverse the game fully to age 42 rules
Moderate
Reverse the game to age 42 rules, with safe number tweaks for minor pot stirring
Extensive
Reverse the game to age 42 rules, adding significant changes after a proper public feedback session