Page 11 of 30 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 447

Thread: Age 46 Changes - Discussion

  1. #151
    Needs to get out more VT2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    10,880
    Again, toast, are you willing to trust that OMAC will manage to do what you're asking of them?

    Be happy with what we have now, and stop whining.
    Catwalk's crusade for legalized cheating was a stunning success, with ghettos and low-tiered teams everywhere losing their wells of knowledge to better kingdoms in the process.

    Step one: replace everything that works.
    Step two: blame the predictable epic fail on outside forces.
    Step three: keep the community informed that no progress has been made since the last update.
    Step four: thank you for your patience.

  2. #152
    Post Fiend aposai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Trabzon
    Posts
    258
    Avian/Tactician pure attacker

    WTF?

    Even with the +%15 losses they were able to survive last age.
    This age they will just butcher up the whole server.

    I like that. (Though i wont play it)

    By the way the name of this age is epic fail .
    Age of distinction?
    Seriously you guys are kidding me. With the changes as they are right now everybody will go for same race/pers combo for the same roles.
    It is an age of similarity fix this please :)

    I like the overall changes though, good job OMAC, but there are some balance issues out there, especially on personalities, some of them are totally crap that nobody would pick them at all. If you cn balance them out it could be nice, but i suggest you to make the changes as you please and dont listen to community :)
    Last edited by aposai; 25-01-2010 at 07:52.
    Utopia: a "Mess"ive multiplayer strategy game since Mehul sold it

  3. #153
    I like to post Realest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,368
    these changes are retarded. There are only maybe two setups playable, and you can bet any non dumb**** kd will run them and it will be stagnant and boring.

  4. #154
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Lappeenranta, Finland
    Posts
    40
    The changes definetly underline some combos too heavily wich leads to them being overplayed as most "reasonable" players will choose to play them. And as result all the mad "cool" changes come to nothing. Balance the races even if it means giving all some mad cool "overpowered" change. And definetly boost mages alot.

  5. #155
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Lappeenranta, Finland
    Posts
    40
    and VT2 you quit. So please cant you stop whining about other people whining?

  6. #156
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    501
    Quote Originally Posted by FireBones View Post
    Just a note, giving gnomes 5/5 instead of 5/4 is hardly any help at all. If you are a gnome attacker, you should already be going with a significant number of defensive specs and be more or less unbreakable unless you send out...so the objective gain from having a 5/5 elite is marginal.
    Never use def specs when running gnome. All elite and use spec credits on OFF specs.

    Can't believe how many people run def specs as gnome....

  7. #157
    Sir Postalot
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Fates Warning View Post
    Never use def specs when running gnome. All elite and use spec credits on OFF specs.

    Can't believe how many people run def specs as gnome....
    fail troll

    Quote Originally Posted by Realest View Post
    these changes are retarded. There are only maybe two setups playable, and you can bet any non dumb**** kd will run them and it will be stagnant and boring.
    this ^
    Deliverance -> secrets -> anzac -> mercy -> rage -> "ghetto"

  8. #158
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    216
    VT2 you don't trust OMAC to makes these changes.. yet did they not just give us these new changes which you(and i as well) think are very interesting???

    I just believe a couple races really got the short end of the stick, no reason why they cant fix those w/o taking away what they already gave us.



    Quote Originally Posted by Fates Warning View Post
    Never use def specs when running gnome. All elite and use spec credits on OFF specs.

    Can't believe how many people run def specs as gnome....
    explain? How can i gnome slay a dragon with off specs if their out grabbing land for the next 9 hrs?

  9. #159
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    446
    i like the changes. there will always be improvements to make, but i like how they approached it this age

    good job omac
    The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination.
    -Albert Einstein

  10. #160
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    23
    LOL. When undeads sucked, the masses complained. When the Avians were brought back and sucked, the masses complained again. Now that the gnomes suck, we see nothing new here. More complaints.

    Jeez...why don't we just make it easy for everyone? Have poll for whatever races y'alls want want to play, call it friggin' whatever race you want, and then stack it with all the stats you want. Seriously people. There are changes to every set to race/personality, some races shine while others do not. (About time for elves to take a more back seat role).

    I like that with the current direction of game mechanics we're moving towards higher rewards for attacking. In the ghetto, a lot players choose to play t/m because players they're low maintenance. They can do the single login per day, do their ops and go. However with the current changes, t/ms can no longer afford to be idle and rely on their defence. Attacking in general requires more activity and might even improve the overall state of the game.

    Although in the ideal world, there should be some tweaks to current game stats to ensure that KDs with bad race/personality choices don't get left behind. But as we can see from this age's charts that we're clearly far from ideal. Lots of people want to do their own thing. For some reason, not everyone listens to logic and numbers.

    With that said, everyone shaddup and let me run my gnome rogue in peace. ;)

  11. #161
    Forum Fanatic gergnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,525
    Quote Originally Posted by Realest View Post
    these changes are retarded. There are only maybe two setups playable, and you can bet any non dumb**** kd will run them and it will be stagnant and boring.
    have to agree with realest here.

  12. #162
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    224
    Quote Originally Posted by Elboxy View Post
    LOL. When undeads sucked, the masses complained. When the Avians were brought back and sucked, the masses complained again. Now that the gnomes suck, we see nothing new here. More complaints.

    Jeez...why don't we just make it easy for everyone? Have poll for whatever races y'alls want want to play, call it friggin' whatever race you want, and then stack it with all the stats you want. Seriously people. There are changes to every set to race/personality, some races shine while others do not. (About time for elves to take a more back seat role).

    I like that with the current direction of game mechanics we're moving towards higher rewards for attacking. In the ghetto, a lot players choose to play t/m because players they're low maintenance. They can do the single login per day, do their ops and go. However with the current changes, t/ms can no longer afford to be idle and rely on their defence. Attacking in general requires more activity and might even improve the overall state of the game.

    Although in the ideal world, there should be some tweaks to current game stats to ensure that KDs with bad race/personality choices don't get left behind. But as we can see from this age's charts that we're clearly far from ideal. Lots of people want to do their own thing. For some reason, not everyone listens to logic and numbers.

    With that said, everyone shaddup and let me run my gnome rogue in peace. ;)
    I doubt gnome rogue can run in peace given the numbers this age. And i doubt you're run a gnome rogue next age otherwise you'll be happy with a little boost.

    Still, when people complained about undeads, it got boosted and still remained fair, avians got boosted this age and remains more or less competitive, so are you saying that we shouldn't complain and make them playable?

  13. #163
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    23
    I like the overall changes though, good job OMAC, but there are some balance issues out there, especially on personalities, some of them are totally crap that nobody would pick them at all.
    Agreed. But that's been the case for a long time. Anyone remember cleric?

  14. #164
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    178
    I demand a high def, static elite for my would be TM province. 0/10 Elite's for De's would fit nicely. Def specs just doesn't cut it for us TM's! ;D

  15. #165
    Veteran Lucky75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    530
    I have to say, I actually really like these changes. They're quite refreshing, and just what the game needs.

    Leave them just as they are!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •