Quote Originally Posted by lichemaster View Post
Yadda this fallacy has already been shown wrong. If there are very few kingdoms with more than >20 players like pro-reductionists claim, there will obviously be even fewer new kingdoms (since many will simply leave or stand aside waiting for spots to open in their kingdom). Basically, with luck, you would get 2-3 more kingdoms out of this change.
Which is excellent! No more kingdoms but instead all kingdoms get filled. Then atleast competition on an equal footing would be possible. No matter how you try to twist this proposed change, having x players distributed over 25 - y kingdoms gives you more kingdoms than having x players distributed over 25 kingdoms.