rules on fake wars

[Judge]

Oh so do you say that only Undead's bottomfeed?

[Midoki]

I didn't read that as only undeads bottomfeed, to be honest I'd question the intelligence of anyone who read 1 example as a "only" scenerio.
To me that person would sound like a troll.

youtube.com/ watch?src_vid=5dI6mPDCqEo&feature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_254124&v=ZAUTXrF5_jQ

[Bishop]

What's with this crap about calling anyone that disagrees with you a troll?

Knock it off, right now.

[Judge]

and when an undead kingdom is bottom feeding on your ghetto what do you do ?

March 12 of YR12 Forces from peice of **** (XX:XX) came through and ravaged our lands! They captured 46 acres! We lost stuff.

600K undead hitting a 350K faery.

What should we do suck it up because its part of "game mechanics" or use said game mechanics and get a fake war to reduce the damage these c u n t s can cause ?

Please read that Midoki.. It was not an example... It clearly mentions as an undead kingdom... Please try not to read a single post but the things behind it as well...

[Midoki]

Please read that Midoki.. It was not an example... It clearly mentions as an undead kingdom... Please try not to read a single post but the things behind it as well...

Example: oxforddictionaries. com/definition/example
What he put up using English is classified as an example, don't hate me cause you made a mistake on what an example is... Like if you lead by example then you do the actions and others will learn from your actions and "follow your example". What happened to the person is a example of how a larger undead has hit a smaller prov and an example of how the rules would justify some people FWing to avoid those type of issues.



@Bishop
I wasn't saying that the individual IS a troll, I just highlighted the attitde was rather ignorant and as such can be seen as trollish.
He never disagree'd with me persay either, I said that as a 3rd party looking at the comments... take a chill pill and relax dude.



Anyway, never meant to p*ss ppl off so sorry, I just took the same attitude that Judge used when he replyed saying the 1time example of a situation that DID occur is a "only" case scenerio. Think we can all agree that a 1 time example of something that DID happen does not mean it is the ONLY race to do so. I'm sure other races will bottomfeed, undead are not the only ones to do that are they? I'm sure we can find examples of other races doing the same thing... No need to jump to conlusion, I'll apologise if I may of sounded agressive so dont get your panties in a twist ^.^

[Bishop]

i don't care what you were trying to highlight, don't do it again.

[Midoki]

Damn, shall i not apologise as well?
/facepalm

[Judge]

This thread is all about undeads midoki... and still u state it as just a one of exmple?

[Midoki]

Judge

"rules on fake wars

is it against the rules to blaintenly enter into a fake war because your to chicken **** to fight? a simple yes or no answer will suffice. It get better SoA are letting them feed on them. what happened to fair and honorable play?

"

The thread is not about undeads, it is about fake wars. Just because undeads came up does not make the thread solely about undeads, please understand that. I was not refering to Undead only, for example Orcs get a +gains bonus and 'could' help them bottom feed. I'm only trying to recognise the various different scenerios and trying to voice reason with more than just one case in mind. I'm not denying Undeads do it but it was never said in black and white that he meant just undeads, do you understand what I mean? ^.^

I'm sorry if you thought I was calling you a troll, i was playing around and i'm use to the sence of humor where my friends would not of took offence by what I said. It's happened to me as well without me realising it till it was pointed out, I just fluffed up by assuming you had a simular sence of humor ^.^ No hard feelings right?

[Judge]

This thread is definately on rules on FW..

But 80% times it just says how undead have an unfair advantage and stuff like that.. Ans he pasted a similar example of it which again had the word Undead in it.
So whoever reads this thread will think it the same as i said..

Also Unban_hurlin's post nowhere mentions that that hit was made from a FW.. it just looked like a bottomfeed for some bad acres..

[Midoki]

I can see what you mean yeah, I didn't see it as "undeads only" and cause it never been said I found it a bit comical that it would be sug ^.^ (no offence again, you know I have a strange sence of humor)

Unban didn't mention attack from a FW but he did show why one would think about entering a FW... I seen that as a example of a potental valid reason to enter a "FW".

^.^

[UnBan Hurlin]

Unban didn't mention attack from a FW but he did show why one would think about entering a FW... I seen that as a example of a potental valid reason to enter a "FW".

Thank you midoki I forgot how idiotic these forums can get and throwing out a quick post late at night without any footnotes can confuse some viewers .......

[Nuriho]

ok, so i've looked at the Rules and Consistency thread and the Rules in the wiki

nothing about fake wars.

if something is illegal, it should be clearly stated it's illegal. from everything i've read from those two sources, fake wars are legal .-.

if it's been illegal for xx years but hasn't had actions taken for or against it (which is what actioned means) then it's a pretty horrible rule, considering it's nowhere to be seen other than occult non-sourced sayings. and by random sayings from official people, which basically turns into occult 'cus it's of nowhere of consequence.

People KNOW jaywalking is illegal.
People DON'T KNOW fake wars are illegal.
the difference is in the print. there is for jaywalking, isn't for fake wars.

[DHaran]

ok, so i've looked at the Rules and Consistency thread and the Rules in the wiki

nothing about fake wars.

if something is illegal, it should be clearly stated it's illegal. from everything i've read from those two sources, fake wars are legal .-.

if it's been illegal for xx years but hasn't had actions taken for or against it (which is what actioned means) then it's a pretty horrible rule, considering it's nowhere to be seen other than occult non-sourced sayings. and by random sayings from official people, which basically turns into occult 'cus it's of nowhere of consequence.

People KNOW jaywalking is illegal.
People DON'T KNOW fake wars are illegal.
the difference is in the print. there is for jaywalking, isn't for fake wars.

Spirit of the Rules

Players attempting to manipulate rules and quirks of the game in ways obviously not intended may be subject to deletion. Because of their nature, these types of circumstances are considered on a case-by-case basis. Users should avoid actions they believe are against the spirit and intent of the game.

Says it right there.

[Midoki]

ok, so i've looked at the Rules and Consistency thread and the Rules in the wiki

nothing about fake wars.

if something is illegal, it should be clearly stated it's illegal. from everything i've read from those two sources, fake wars are legal .-.

if it's been illegal for xx years but hasn't had actions taken for or against it (which is what actioned means) then it's a pretty horrible rule, considering it's nowhere to be seen other than occult non-sourced sayings. and by random sayings from official people, which basically turns into occult 'cus it's of nowhere of consequence.

People KNOW jaywalking is illegal.
People DON'T KNOW fake wars are illegal.
the difference is in the print. there is for jaywalking, isn't for fake wars.

I'd agree, put in plain print what is expected from players.

Wouldn't keeping it quiet hurt ghettos more? Active kds and players who participate in the community will have heard at somepoint what is and isn't excusable and if they ever need to explain themselves then they can think of an excusable aliby while the ghetto who done exactly the same thing may word it wrongly and get punished. These kind of situations I believe leads to unfair punishment, you don't punish everyone who is doing wrong and only punish the people who didn't go all out to trick the system.

I dunno if I can have my "war on stupidity" by using the offence known as "books" to "beat the stupidity" out of my own peasents... Just like the USA/UK and several other countries have "The war on drugs", it's a war but not like a traditional war... and then we have "the war on terror"...

I'm not arguing FW shouldn't be punished but at least be clear about the expectations so misunderstanding is less likly to happen.