Results 1 to 15 of 1118

Thread: BIO vs ghettocats

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Forum Fanatic
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,010
    Quote Originally Posted by prot View Post
    Why am I a hypocrite for vouching my opinion? I think you're a sissy for noticing BiO an hour before they go hostile with your allies HoH. What else has to be said about vultures in that nature? You need xxx million gold advantage to be able to beat BiO, probably to prevent having a similair scenario to last age where you lost your acres to them.
    Like I said: if this ever happens to you, you'll be first man on deck telling how lame it is. We'll see in the future who the hypocrite is

    And rofl anti-abs propaganda?! You're the one spewing your Abs propaganda all over the place playing mr innocent. You played dirty vs Insolence 3 times last age. Dirty in the essence of not being an act of glory, but an act of misery and lameness.
    #1: We waved Fury. A few hours later, while no diplo had been done between us and Fury, you wave us with our armies still out. We only had a few ops from Fury, but theres enough reason to see that as a double hostile.
    #2: You warred BiO, you lost acres in the process. You sent us notice while in your EOWCF.
    #3: You sent us notice 10 minutes after we noticed Fury.

    You whined and called me a blocker on #2. What did you expect? To train up and let you go? Especially when 2 or 3 people from Rage spew their ****ty propaganda claiming you did not want a round 2 with Rage but wanted to fight us instead cause we would be unprepared?
    Of course I wave you when I train. You're an idiot if you think otherwise, especially after an almost the same scenario an age earlier with Sanctuary (noticing us during their hostile with Pulse). That is your own stupid mistake :)

    Same when you *****ed about our notice on Fury which in your (and almost all of Abs) eyes was blocking.
    When I spoke with ASF yesterday he agreed that Fury was indeed our best pick for a target. To sum that up;
    - Sanctuary was busy, had a small core anyway.
    - Rage was larger, had 2 huge provinces but their core wasn't left with alot of acres (thats also why in war #2 we did worse numberwise as we did performancewise, had your core been bigger and your calves been smaller that war may have taken a different turn)
    - Fury was larger, had 2 huge provinces and their core wasn't much different from ours.

    Fury was our best target choice hence why we picked them.

    Proteus: stop pretending to be innocent. Everyone who has half a brain knows this is just political play. Once you get what you have, you show your real self. Right now you're just trying to mate with cats so they leave you alone and hunt your enemies next age.

    You just don't want to stop spewing BS propaganda on here? You still haven't addressed my point. Bio (your ally) double teamed us age 51. You can't say I noticed them prior to their fight with Hoh and fail to mention that. Or according to you is it okay to ****play Rage but not okay for us to playback. Not to mention it was in an appropriate way rather than doubling them back or taking their crown away last age. So stop whining.

    Also I like how you mention we lost acres. We Lost 3k acres because they withdrew minting with a way. Id rather win than lose over 3k acres, flogger agreed with this as well. It's also pretty funny when you try to rub in the "accomplishments" of others into our face. Why not talk about yourself? Insolence/Inzzolence has not won a crown or even a war since inception man. I would look in the Mirror before pointing fingers.

    Also let's not forget there is an EOA winner interview with Baka where he discussed that Inso/OS was coordinating as part of the winning strategy last age. So yes you attempted to block Fury and OS blocked Sanc.

    Every time you try to call out Rage for serving notice to a kingdom that was not in hostile you make yourself look bad. When you neglect to mention that this was a kingdom that double hostiled Rage, you portray yourself as an anti-Abs person who does not uphold 1v1 play. It's all good when your allies are double hostiling us but it's a sheer crime when we give someone notice according to our deal. Your hypocrisy knows no limits.

    As for your accusations of "copying up" with cats, that's a load of bs/propaganda. I don't need to do anything as I didn't really have issues cfing them before you guys gbed them. They robbed us lkke everyone else but were willing to move on because I treated them with respect and did not threaten them. I don't gangbang kingdoms because I don't like their monarchs or kingdoms who play 1v1. Bio 2v1ed Rage, Grace, and now Cats..there is a clear track record.

    If you want to make posts include the facts or post a disclaimer saying you are running propaganda ops. If someone ****played me in the past they can expect to get it back. Don't. 2v1 and gangbang and you will be treated fairly. I know Prot you prefer for me to eat 2v1 and bend over but that's not how I play. Insolence robbed Rage all age in age 52 when we crowned and attempted to block our pump. We settled our score with you last age when we went FSU when we prevented you from blocking and doing what you want. If you want to ****play, bring it on, you will receive it right back.
    Last edited by Proteus; 17-07-2012 at 20:03.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •