But sending ALL kingdoms there way is NOT the proper action, nor is it for sinners to take advantage of an obviously active multi hostile.Originally Posted by UnknownGhost
This situation will be remembered and referenced. Jdorje, I hope you know you just did exactly what you told godly you would "obviously not" do. You think it's lame to serve a kd notice, but even you should agree intentionally multi-hostiling is lame. GG.
Giving HoH the button doesn't mean other people can't hit you.
Stop crying like a ***** and man up.
You got us there. We're pretty lame. :(
#sinners <---click to join
Apparently abs policy is now 'it's fine to hit into a hostile, as long as you called dibs'...
That policy is not new to Abs.
Simians knew Sanctuary would hit them. They just chose to hit HoH hoping to avoid it.
hilaribad. Simians gave notice to Sanc and talked **** about them for days, now Sanc engages Simians, simians tries to flee the hostile with sanc by hitting HOH and now is surprised that Sanc is following up on the hostile Simians knew they were getting when they noticed?
Classic anri.
Simians was directly told Sanc was fighting them. Sanc initiated before Simians started. Simians was informed they would not be fighting HoH. After hiding for an hour in fort, and temporarily *untagging* hostile vs. HoH, Simians decided that the best course of active was to hit HoH and whine for support, knowing that Sanc was going to be the one fighting them and knowing Sanc would wave them when they dropped fort no matter what.
Anri was afraid of Sanc, chose to get himself into a "double hostile", and is now whining for his life and trying to be a martyr. We chose who was going to fight you. Whether you disagreed or not was not our problem. You knew you'd be waved the moment you left fort.
The only poor play here belongs to Anri for waving a kingdom that obviously had no intentions to fight his out of pure fear.
It's fun to watch him squirm, though.
notice does not constitute hostile
**** talking does not constitute hostile
1 hit into a bank does not constitute hostile
even sending a dragon does not constitute hostile
calling dibs does not constitute hostile
hitting a KD into hostile DOES does not constitute hostile
Simians hit HoH into hostile, then Sanc waved into Simians. Regardless of whether everyone should have seen it coming, it's still pretty clear it's BS.
sanc claimed us by making one hit when we intended for pretty much a month to war HoH.
We gave HoH button. If sanc had balls they would have given us the button. That defines a hostile relation. There is no dibbs, you can certainly not hit a KD that gave another KD the button just cause you want to war that KD. Finish the wave and now let HoH declare. Pure powerplaying. Its okey thou, cause we know what abs think now. We can treat them the same way in the future. We gonna put dibbs on sanctuary every time they go war/hostile.
#?
#42
#Pandas
#Simians
K L AKaer Loche Alliance
Real life of Anri - Utopia addicthttp://instagram.com/henke82
This sounds accurate.
and calling names and ****talking a kingdom for an entire day and then running away isn't BS ? hitting HoH after receving dragon and attacks from the kingdom whom you called names all day and afterwards crying a river isn't lame ? i actually hoped to see a fight between simians and abs after the drama in this thread but the amount of BS you guys spread around is impressive.
lol im laughing my ass off reading this stuff.
now sinners is involved for no apparent reason but because anri is, well, anri?????
If I didn't know any better I'd assume this is just for simian's chance to crown the longest thread which is currently being held by bio killing kittens. We had a nice head start, but I see massive potential in this. All we need is the plot to thicken further by having a horde of absholes come here and justify shake and bake-ing rage to a dice victory again. "If ya aint first ur last!" -"that's stupid, you can be second, third, fourth... hell you can even be fifth" Does sanc and hoh get partial crown credit for helping them so much?????? Is taht how it works?
Anyway, it seems as if there's a new utopia term in this whole thing - "dibbs".
So a dibbs isn't a hostile or is it? If the older kingdom calls dibbs first does it override an earlier dibbs call? Can you double dibbs but not double hostile? These are questions that must be answered by the higher power of absholeville.
Being butthurt by whatever 'name calling and **** talking' you're talking about is not a valid reason for waving into a hostile :P
When you have enough crowns, every ages is the same thing. Nothing like having fun and filter the bull. Play the game. if you win; you win. If not better luck next time. =)
Play with common sense.
Overall:
ODD
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote