Dragging hostility

[flutterby]

Doesn't it depend on what races they're using? Which (since I only skimmed the thread) haven't been stated yet..

[Palem]

Not really. GBP+cheap explore = sorry, no chains.

[flutterby]

Chaining isn't necessarily the only way to do damage. They're unfriendly, right? They can do ops in conjunction with well placed hits.

[Palem]

Yea, but Shaded was talking about chaining people.

Then watch your attackers get raped as they chain you with zero incoming acres

They'd need to declare if they wanted to chain people without land coming in, which means they get what they want.

[nataku]

What is it with you and hostiles? Wasent you crying in some other thread about a few days hostiles?

Nope. It wasn't me thought i had a week long hostile before. It is really lousy.

Now i am stuck again. in another hostile. Just wondering the best way to make them declare war.

[nataku]

Yea, but Shaded was talking about chaining people.




They'd need to declare if they wanted to chain people without land coming in, which means they get what they want.

Chaining is not an option.

The GBP sets in pretty fast.

[nataku]

Those 2 things indicate they will not press button until they have done enough damage to you and thus already winning the war before its declared

Not sure how much damage we r taking but considerably the damage should be around the same. =)

[coorsprg]

Maybe its just the tm heavy kds that find it in their favor to drag hostile on kds with large number of pure attackers....but dragging hostility is the only option they seem to have....on the other hand maybe they don't want war anymore just don't want admit it.

[Sauron NBK]

It's a typical bit*h move in utopia these days. I don't really see the point of dragging hostilities THIS long as they've definitely taken more damage than us. I think it's more they're trying to annoy the crap outta us by dragging hostilities out because they've realized they don't have a prayer in beating us.

[Palem]

Maybe its just the tm heavy kds that find it in their favor to drag hostile on kds with large number of pure attackers....but dragging hostility is the only option they seem to have....on the other hand maybe they don't want war anymore just don't want admit it.

There's only a few good reasons for dragging out hostilities and having less attackers/more TMs isn't one of them. That fact isn't going to change with a longer hostile lol

[NoseBlood]

It's a typical bit*h move in utopia these days. I don't really see the point of dragging hostilities THIS long as they've definitely taken more damage than us. I think it's more they're trying to annoy the crap outta us by dragging hostilities out because they've realized they don't have a prayer in beating us.

Ah, sense BoB are so pro, maybe you can grow larger next age? You wont have problem finding wars then.

[nataku]

Ah, sense BoB are so pro, maybe you can grow larger next age? You wont have problem finding wars then.

totally out of context.

BoB never claimed they are pro.

Being larger doesn't mean you can find war easier too.

Its not about finding wars too. Its about dragging hostilities.

Please read carefully. Thanks

[nataku]

There's only a few good reasons for dragging out hostilities and having less attackers/more TMs isn't one of them. That fact isn't going to change with a longer hostile lol

Probably won't change.
With longer hostile,

does it work better for kingdoms with more TMs?

[Palem]

It's fine if there's a target or two that you want something done on specifically before war, but the idea that you're going to somehow "Disable" a couple attackers before the war so things are more even is absurd.

As long as you have a reasonable kd-core, having more or less TMs isn't a make-or-break factor for most kds and their wars. If everyone does their job and your plan is effective, you'll prolly win.

[EvilClown666]

No wonder this game is losing alot of players. Why cant they change it back to the old days were kd's hit each other until it escalates into a war and not depend on some button.