exactly!Originally Posted by flutterby
exactly!
ED should go back to there super kingdom in farm ville.
Seriously? That's the best you've got? Farmville? Go home little boy... let the big people do that talking here. :P
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<Bishop> I don't dislike Ezzerland
<Bishop> We are just incompatible
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<~Palem> I read that as "snuffleupegas gropes Palem" twice lol
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
if you want the war win crown to mean something then the following age whoever tops the war win chart should vs the top of land/nw chart. and go down the list from both charts and if any of the people get a war win vs a kingdom from the top 10 they become the champions of war from the previous age, since i doubt more then 1 ww kingdom would beat a land/nw kingdom. and since spgc are on both list in the top 10 they can have a bye and face any winner for ultimate champion of war.
They would just pick beastblood again!
It's not accomplishing any other goals of gaining land/nw/honour, the downfall in your post is that you don't seem to be intelligent enough to grasp a very simple concept that one random war has zero correlation with how you can compare individual war wins which KDs have.
Here I'll give you an example, Debaucherys win vs. ED should be worth a lot more than Stoners win vs. ED. Why? Because I think half our KD logged in once a day vs. Stoners, I barely used IRC and our activity due to RL matters was in general none existent, while vs. Debauchery we were playing with pretty much all of our KD either being sat or on high activity. Yet both KDs gained one war win.
If you can't understand that then it's your loss.
we have been really lucky that not a single KD has meant to war us the last 4 ages. It confuses me that they always seem to wave in to us even when we have hostilities with other KD's. But once everything is said and done "we never meant to war" and "none of our provinces were able to log in" all seem to have been part of the plan. I guess i'm just not much of a strategy guy. Maybe sometime soon we will get to war someone who actually is looking for war.
What's the point of this post? Since it's in the ED thread I'm going to guess it's aimed at us, however I'm kinda unsure as to who has said ED didn't mean to war Stoners? Maybe I missed something from the war forums as I've not been in there all war, or maybe you're just making random crap up and having a ramble.
Actually debated putting my comment about comparing Debauchery and Stoners wars for ED as I was pretty sure someone from Stoners would get butthurt because I said we were better in a totally unrelated war, simple fact is we were.
If you want to take comments about our KDs relative activity as having anything to do with you to the point that you need to post about it then unlucky. but the world doesn't revolve around you and facts don't change just because your internet ego see's it as somehow randomly insulting you.
We warred you, you won, end.
Another thing that surprise me is how does those kingdoms that win so many wars constantly be able to stay so small.
Because winning wars isn't always about a net gain in land..
You are doomed to get some land either way, even if you dont break even the acrre spread in your kingdom will be messed up.
Stoner is just unhappy that they didn't get as much credit from ED for defeating ED compared to Dechauery. ED discredited stoner by saying that their kingdom activity is only half of what should be expected. Best solution: Stoner vs Dechauery
He reacted in that way cause you indirectly attributed their WW to your poor activity and performance rather than just admitting they were better, shaking hand and moving on.
It may or may not be truth, and if its truth its hard to say which one is cause and which one is consequence, either way bad sportmanship on your part.
I completely agree on the WW crown topic btw, i wouldnt mind seeing it removed from the game. Ever since KD pages started displaying war record its been causing nothing but problems.
Chose honor for war win bonus instead of acre? Anyway, for my kingdom with 5 ww, we are at 58k acres. Didn't landdrop and we even explore during cf to keep up with unchain tm and attackers. Who are you referring to in particular?
How exactly would you suggest I phrased the fact we were semi-active vs. Stoners, so as to keep them all happy? Should I just lie and say I spent 10 hours a day infront of my PC like the rest of the KD and we got outplayed by a far superior KD?
If you re-read my post you'd see that I never once gave any excuses as to why we lost vs. Stoners, they could be the best KD in the game and it would be irrelevant as I only commented on our individual activity not their skill.
All that's happened is you've read a piece of information about our activity and decided to interpret it as slagging Stoners off, when if anything it's slagging off ED.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote