CR vs AMA

[Band of Horses]

BTW want to note Havoc razed 1 small kd i asked for help and send them scary msg and same time they use more shell kds for raze us oow. This bad act to kds try help against BS you doing wont be tolerated. You cant bully server for long.
If any one is feel brave enough for raze rage smaller prov he can process it.

Rage threaten my kd for raze. Now I have to defect.

[Elit]

Rage threaten my kd for raze. Now I have to defect.

Should we tag "fair punish"? Or server will look way so fair :D

[Anri]

SWEA was a deal breaker. You didn't deem them unfit. In fact, much like you're trying to do with CR, you handed them a crown.

Elit twisted a knife in my back after we had warred SWEA i did not hand swea a crown. It was a direct result of Elit lying and breaking his word to his own allies.

You see, there is one thing about Elit you can always count on, he will backstab and lie each age. This age it happend to CR. If he avoids it one age, he might acctually go thru a full age fair and crown it.

[Anri]

Should we tag "fair punish"? Or server will look way so fair :D

FAIR PLAY

Same tagg for all, kd names not needed. Who wins and who losses wont matter. We all have just fun doing whatever we feel like. This was my general idea before GB, you know why? Because after dealbreak this age is not valid any longer and the crown is a joke. I wanted age 60 to be a change for something new and fresh. You think i am looking to hurt AMA, thats the worst BS i heard. I dont like you and some others in AMA. But i acctually did not want a GB to take place at all from the start. I wanted all of this to be about FAIR PLAY and my demand was easy, tagg FAIR PLAY and lets all just have fun and let this age be about something else then just dealbreaks and other ****. Use the time to make some rules and stuff we can follow for next age.

You have a very paranoid ego, the world does not circuit around AMA like i said before.
But when GB came into effect i damn well will execut it like GBs always been executed.
The dealbreaker does not get to make the terms etc.

[Palem]

Elit twisted a knife in my back after we had warred SWEA i did not hand swea a crown. It was a direct result of Elit lying and breaking his word to his own allies.

You see, there is one thing about Elit you can always count on, he will backstab and lie each age. This age it happend to CR. If he avoids it one age, he might acctually go thru a full age fair and crown it.

SWEA lied and backstabbed their allies. They even did it BEFORE Elit.

You done pretending this has nothing to do with "fair play" and it's just personal?

[Elit]

You see, there is one thing about Anri you can always count on, he will QQ 24/7!

Fixed for you :)

[Anri]

SWEA lied and backstabbed their allies. They even did it BEFORE Elit.

You done pretending this has nothing to do with "fair play" and it's just personal?

read above, you all think you are some experts on simians and anri when you are 100% wrong.

[Anri]

Fixed for you :)

like a child

[Soul_Hunter]

Of course it is. Anri said 100 times Elit twisted a knife in his back. Idk how Anri does it but second time he makes a gb against a kd and hands a crown to another. Also conveniently Anri said he was busy with something else every time some other kd did dealbreaks and ****plays. He was only there for gb when AMA does it. :) Fair play. Anyway i don't care. Go Anri, take all competitors of CR. And let them the crown. Or maybe you will tell me that if AMA had warred Pyro, the competition would have been the same as now?

[Anri]

the main goal is still to have CR and Pyro to war for the crown, as soon as AMA gives up thier resistance and stops beleiving dealbreaks is okey. I dont know how you missed that after 110+ pages in here.

[Palem]

There is only one alliance

Simians & PewPew

Chartshapers.

[Anri]

There is only one alliance

Simians & PewPew

Chartshapers.

you obviously dont read what i am saying. Nice trolling moderator.

For the 3rd time in a very short time. I want EVERYONE to tagg FAIR PLAY. I want CR+PYRO have final war for the crown but still use FAIR PLAY in time for the age to end.

No point talking when you avoid the subject for trolling.

[Palem]

Why bother warring? You said it's tainted and the tag is to avoid giving any credit. So warring is pointless.

Maybe it's because you're full of crap and everything that spews out of your mouth is garbage.
/trollmod

[Anri]

warring pointless you are correct, im down for that.
To make a change for the better for incoming age 61

[Soul_Hunter]

You started the whole conversation saying the goal is to take AMA out of crown race. They are out of it. Then you said u want cfs to all kds, AMA agreed to that. Then you again changed and want Pyro to raze acres (how is that relevant to the war with CR on equal terms?). Why did you decide you want Pyro to raze acres after the initial request from CR for them to make tms? Why CR demands anything from Pyro when it was them who dictated who and how Pyro hits in the AMA vs CR war? Poor CR they lost 800 milion in the whole thing, let's gb pyro and make it even so that CR can farm them.

Btw do you guys consider chart shaping something that requires gb? cause:

- pewpew did chartshape farming out to SWEA and RBL
- Simians did chartshape with 2 GBs on crown competitors
- if Pyro are forced to raze their acres and then war CR that's another chart shape

So in total you have RBL, SImians and CR doing chart shaping, first two on 2 different occasions and the results is? They tag Fair Play.

P.S. Anri you always say let's change but:

- AMA hit pewpew in their war with strippers, some ppl said that was wrong and we changed. We didn't hit in Pewpew vs ED wars.
- Pewpew did some bad chart shaping but this age they stay away from major top ****play
- Simians made a gb against crown contender N1 and let the other kd take the crown, now they do the same.

Why you talk about change when you don't change.