#?
#42
#Pandas
#Simians
K L AKaer Loche Alliance
Real life of Anri - Utopia addicthttp://instagram.com/henke82
Well I didn't confirm anything but if Ya need to be mad at us rather than just own up then feel free!
"having fun warring when you have whoring and number 1 as a goal is totally pointless..." - Korp
"while I heart shiester when we both play serious and are in the same kingdom, I hate shiester on the forums and pretty much disagree with everything he says. Even he knows this." - Flogger asking me out on a date
The devs have made a decision to kill competitive utopia and have thereby killed my interest with it.
lampost so 2 people cant have different views on events?
I still dont get what it is you wish to say or point out with your post... Sheister points out rather well how it can be connected.
Last edited by Aranfein; 24-06-2015 at 22:43.
War is what happens when language fails.
The compensation you was demanded was that your only competition drop out of competition YR1. That is not compensation. You were offered whatever land, gc, cf timings, or other reparations that were needed to ensure that BB's position was as good or better than it would have been had Bour never razed. You were offered whatever actual compensation BB felt needed to fix their position completely. You were not interested in any deal that let Emeriti have anything close to a fair war against BB. You were also given 2.8x the lost acres back form Bour plus his kingdom agreed to be limited by BB set acre caps which is essentially what BB said they wanted from Bour all along.
You tried to threaten the kingdom ahead of you on the charts who was your only real competition to surrender the age to you YR 1 under implied threats of deal break and gang bang. The kingdom you were trying to blackmail had already apologized to you and offered whatever was needed to ensure BB was not harmed. I'd recommend any kingdom you try such **** play on to not fall victim to such threats of dishonorable play but to instead play fair themselves, offer generous compensation to right any wrongs, and if you are still so desperate as to deal break and gb into a war, then you will only expose yourself for a coward. This is exactly what Emeriti did and what you did.
1 thing i dont get is why dont you both pull out and leave it at that, you can both donate me 30k acres each and we call it case closed and i wont send my kd in to whoop you both ;)
War is what happens when language fails.
I think we need a proxy war where we each aid a 17 province ghetto to greatness against the other
"having fun warring when you have whoring and number 1 as a goal is totally pointless..." - Korp
"while I heart shiester when we both play serious and are in the same kingdom, I hate shiester on the forums and pretty much disagree with everything he says. Even he knows this." - Flogger asking me out on a date
The devs have made a decision to kill competitive utopia and have thereby killed my interest with it.
Gee such a choice. "Give up on the age or we'll break our formal cf deal with you and gb you into your legit war despite you apologizing and offering generous compensation of whatever we felt needed to completely fix our position!"
I'd be completely embarrassed to act so terrified of a lone kingdom and would never stoop to such levels.
WPA loss, science loss, etc is not fixable. You keep saying the same thing even though it's obviously not true. You can only really offer land and gc but that does not "ensure that BB's position was as good or better. You and bour can't give some things back to us just based on game mechanics alone. Then we find out it was at your suggestion that bour does the aggregious act in the first place. Once you send your friend in to do this, do you really deserve a fair 1v1 war? We would say no, you obviously disagree. You can call us the bad guys, blame us, do whatever you like. You've been doing it already. We didn't suggest to our friend that he hit into eowcf and interrupt our opponents pump. That would be you.
Sheister, They seem to be pretty inconsistent. Aranfein seems to be agreeing that its about revenge, the compensation offered was irrelevant. You're basing the whole GB and Dealbreak on the fact that a fair offer of compensation was not given.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)