Quote Originally Posted by Felonious View Post
Says the guy who thinks dousing dumb arguments in legalese somehow makes them better arguments (it doesnt).

In fact, whenever you post, I'm consistently shocked to know you're a lawyer irl. asf's 'repetitiveness' that you point out as the exception to bad arguing is actually well known as a BAD way to argue (argumentum ad nauseam). It doesnt mean his claims are wrong (they are in fact right!). But you will almost never get someone to concede anything in an argument/debate by repeating the same thing over and over. (Your poor clients...)
Says the lady who can only argue based on ignoring what people post, i.e. "I started to read what you wrote but then I tuned out...." (or many similar such statements) and then attempts to pick apart an argument by complaining that words that have been used are "too big" (despite them having been defined and referenced for the convenience of the reader.)

/me shrugs.

If you lack the patience, respect and education to argue, don't.