Respect

[Nightmare_]

Now you're twisting words citadela01. The implication was indeed that they weren't growing to reap benefit. The hypocritical deal is that you obviously bottom feed. It's part of the game to bottom feed and who do you feed on? The kingdoms that might be trying to grow in range.

You can mechanically do what you want in game, but I'm calling BS on your forum rhetoric. The irony is a bottom feeding kingdom calling the little kingdom they're attacking little bottom feeders. You know that you can't get around the numbers: 94% is 94% and 103% is 103%. Those are facts and those are war numbers.

Jmiedema is a good person and maybe you need to hear me say that. I challenged him and I think we have an understanding.

So what are we discussing? To be honest I have no clue. I originally thought this was to discuss specific actions and events. Semantics and relative opponent NW? Both are easily manipulated. Relative NW swings with a single lopsided war. Or repeatedly giving button through waves. Are you miffed that someone called Ruthless bottomfeeders? Then surely people will retract it. No one holds any strong opinions in support of it. Don't know why an entire thread was created out of this. From what it seems like, no one even called Ruthless bottomfeeders, though. Everyone chooses a tier in which they feel they can compete for logistic, skill-based, or leadership reasons -- that seems like the message. If I'm wrong someone should quote the post.

FS poor thing. They used to appear in forum when great war is happening...now they always show up in forum over negative issue....SAd

Are they just plain unlucky or is the people? Sigh

Probably a mixture