What BeastBlood needed to Crown

[Persain]

I'm not sure what kind of moral standing ground you're standing on to be criticising the way we played but the stuff I've seen from divinity are equally bad if not worse.

So all in All, divinity, you're the last kd I would expect to cry foul on our win because we kept all our promises to you and were nice to you all age.

maybe its an english as a first language thing, and i wasnt clear nesta as even sheister didnt understand exactly what i meant initially. i had no issues with how u played, nor was i crying foul. No one in my kd is claiming(or should be) anything bad about u guys...i just wanna point that out first. Next;

My point was given your setup i dont think u would have won unless all the side stuff happened for the exact same reason we couldnt give you hostile. Your setup was stronger...but not "better" than most of the top. Stronger in a sense that you could pump gc faster i.e. what happened to us, were garenteed to farm smaller kds, i.e. emeriti, could masively slow down a kd that would beat u in war, see CR....but wasnt 'better" in the sense you had no easy way to gain acres, or convince kds that going into war was going to be anything other than a farmout. The only way to beat u was to either be WAY bigger or have some other intangible massive advantage, and had the age not been a ****storm cr may have knocked you down when they HAD that. My guess was you'd of fallen outa range. The ****storm gave your setup its ability to shine and as it was you guys played things out really nicely.