4:15 Frost Giants vs 6:10 Emeriti Round 2

[StratOcastle]

So if a kd A waves and the other kd B fb, ns and MS for two weeks, and refuse to CF then a third kd C can come and wave kd A while kd B is still opping? This is good to know for the future if it is ok so that i can take a print screen and show it for ages to come :)

Please discuss!

There is no precedence; it's just that professional arguers join top kingdoms to debate for debates sake. The illusion of order is satisfied by the existence of diplomats for whom only top kingdoms can satisfy their thirst for "getting your facts straight".

The rules are based in power and willingness to destroy power.

PS: While Madchess may've had problems with Emeriti I haven't, but Madchess is a superior province manager and tends to get to threat size more often. I've had good experiences with BeastBlood, particularly with protector.

[Korp]

There is no precedence; it's just that professional arguers join top kingdoms to debate for debates sake. The illusion of order is satisfied by the existence of diplomats for whom only top kingdoms can satisfy their thirst for "getting your facts straight".

The rules are based in power and willingness to destroy power.

PS: While Madchess may've had problems with Emeriti I haven't, but Madchess is a superior province manager and tends to get to threat size more often. I've had good experiences with BeastBlood, particularly with protector.

Ofc there is. A pretty famous case on top of that, AMA Vs Sanc round 2.

[StratOcastle]

Ofc there is. A pretty famous case on top of that, AMA Vs Sanc round 2.

It hasn't changed the fact that everybody knows what hostile is, but nobody can agree on what is hostile.

If top kingdoms could secure 1 parachute to their multi-age drama:

Ape Shall Never Kill Ape

We still see evidence that the best way to win the age is to lie still, drooling, with a heart monitor beeping periodically. Then suddenly jump up and say:

"I'm ok! It's a miracle!"