Results 1 to 15 of 131

Thread: WSK vs CR

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 05-06-2017, 12:33 #1
    Ovenmitt
    Ovenmitt is offline
    Postaholic Ovenmitt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    861
    Quote Originally Posted by cRs View Post
    Lol for sure wasnt intentional... after we failed the LL round (cuz of bad coding.. now it works) we saw we can explore our cq tms abit.. and thats all we did - put 150a on every elf that got cq. If we wanted to exploit we would have grew all our ub tms :)
    But meh whateva.. as I sayed didnt even knew the costs where not correct :)
    Gl hf
    you failed the ll round because we ma'd your ll like 20 times XD
    -- Freedom Valley - Cartoon Networth - Harsh Cheeses - HaLL of FORCE - The Fantastic Trollfags - Polar Bears - Simians - Pew Pew - RoO - Mango Unchained - RoO
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 05-06-2017, 12:39 #2
    cRs
    cRs is offline
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    471
    Quote Originally Posted by Ovenmitt View Post
    you failed the ll round because we ma'd your ll like 20 times XD
    Was not about fails.. was about gains and u know about them.. when u do 10 lls (succes) om 1500-1700a prov and get 30-40a is not right
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 05-06-2017, 12:54 #3
    JeffT
    JeffT is offline
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    1,077
    Quote Originally Posted by cRs View Post
    Was not about fails.. was about gains and u know about them.. when u do 10 lls (succes) om 1500-1700a prov and get 30-40a is not right
    This section of the code is unchanged and looks entirely possible to me. Not even that unlikely. A quick glance at a random number generator had that result 2 times out of 5.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 05-06-2017, 13:17 #4
    cRs
    cRs is offline
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    471
    Quote Originally Posted by JeffT View Post
    This section of the code is unchanged and looks entirely possible to me. Not even that unlikely. A quick glance at a random number generator had that result 2 times out of 5.
    Dont disagree with you but once the explore cost was fixed (wich seems was the eowcf costs looking now) but once the eplore was fixed the lls alsp worked corectlly.. we gain 1-20a/op..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 05-06-2017, 13:53 #5
    SnirpsneR
    SnirpsneR is offline
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    499
    Quote Originally Posted by cRs View Post
    Dont disagree with you but once the explore cost was fixed (wich seems was the eowcf costs looking now) but once the eplore was fixed the lls alsp worked corectlly.. we gain 1-20a/op..
    You were gaining 1-20 on that failed ll as well. See our news below. Also I believe you got 63 or 65 acres. Not 30.

    noticed a possible spell attempt by cRs (7:13) causing trouble on our lands!
    April 1 of YR1 3 acres of land have disappeared from our control!
    April 1 of YR1 18 acres of land have disappeared from our contro
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 05-06-2017, 16:31 #6
    JeffT
    JeffT is offline
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    1,077
    Quote Originally Posted by cRs View Post
    Dont disagree with you but once the explore cost was fixed (wich seems was the eowcf costs looking now) but once the eplore was fixed the lls alsp worked corectlly.. we gain 1-20a/op..
    LLs have been working correctly the entire time...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules