Printable View
IIRC john, pew pew did that because the competitor "**** played" them (no, I have zero knowledge of it so I am going off a half remembered piece of bull from I don't know how many ages ago) Quite frankly, given my disgust with BB if someone had proposed it two or three days ago, I might well have happily given all acres to AMA if it were my call (which it was not) and if I thought it would lock BB out.
Finished #2 last age after not participating in the retarded gb against AMA and then paid for 2 EoA CFs this age with acres, how exactly are we killing the game?Quote:
Originally Posted by brickwolfman
Razing our banks in the hostile against BB was the only option left available. Had we eventually taken the fight to war, would it be in our best interest to be fighting three 14-15k provinces with two 7k former banks or three 10-11k provinces with two 7k former banks?
The intra kd land drop during hostile was a strategic move, not a **** play. Fncking get your head out of your ass. After I realized half of the kd wasn't going to be active in war I approached BB to negotiate the land for CF deal.
To add to this:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tox
Was it considered ****play when Fratzia did this same move prior to warring CR? Nope, strategy because it was Coss. #DoubleStandards
It was probably the best move available if Pew2 wanted to war and deny BB many cow acres. That it didn't work out that way for them, and that BB didn't get the fight they were hoping for, was a shame. But imo pew2 didn't do much wrong. Not even BB accused them of ****playing, since they realized they may have pushed their advantage a bit too far.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tox
Its funny to see all the old people who complained that abs ruined the game complain about ama and bb. Life is so cyclical haha
Define old...
You remember playing when boats, plazas, and miners mystique were in the game.Quote:
Originally Posted by BungArm
Yay for old !
So, now, who is tras referring to old then... ?!
Probably sheister
lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Sheister
They were our nominal allies at the time who had a yr X CF with debauchery. upon learning that we intended to wave debauch they went and organised themselves a friendly war for debauchery to run into where pew could grow their cows and debauch could hide from us.
They went on to, in a subsequent age, farm out to rage doing learns while rage did anon trads on provs with no off in war. Fortunately they didn't have enough acres to transfer to cange the age that time and this lead to AMA and BB strong arming rage into a non compete deal for the rest of the age.
The very next age they were openly allied to rage.
The lols continue, but I w/e. Pews play this age is far more clean and they should be commended for it.
Tox for fair play award!Quote:
Originally Posted by John Snowstorm
Pew plays cleans now it's not tem you need to worry about, it's the n00b maximiuse who came up with "fair play" tag last age and had all gbers tag it yet him and his FairPlay ally RBL were openly caught and actioned cheating this age via mechanic abuse.Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzzy|
Actually this topic is started from AMA player (ex PB) but most ppl didn't got his troll :PQuote:
Originally Posted by tras19
oddplay
Plazas were around for a long time. You could be middle aged and remember playing with Plazas and Taverns ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Runefire