Sheister vs Sampuan

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

28-02-2016, 07:41
DM_Benjamin

Generally Palems moderation is good, I think he put his foot in his mouth with the trolling looks thing though. Especially after recent weeks of triggering Godly.
28-02-2016, 10:52
citadela01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Band of Horses

Actually, you are using a straw man since I never said FS or quoted FS in my statement. Mine again wasn't an argument it was a statement.

You are right. I stand corrected, my bad.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godly

I am a nice guy as well, but I am just more competitive than you are. You will never understand the thought process of a champion. However, I'm an open book and since you keep wanting to pry into my personal life, here are the facts: I have been in therapy for a long time due to my competitive desires and its impact on managing relationships with other human beings. As my shrink always tells me, you cant find a truly great person without a cup of narcissism and a dash of megalomania.

I am sorry to hear you have such problems. Hopefully you can get it under control, best of luck with that.
28-02-2016, 14:44
Palem

Quote:

Originally Posted by DM_Benjamin

Generally Palems moderation is good, I think he put his foot in his mouth with the trolling looks thing though. Especially after recent weeks of triggering Godly.

I'll accept this criticism if you can find a single instance of me making any sort of comment on Godly's appearance.
28-02-2016, 15:50
Korp

Quote:

Originally Posted by Palem

I'll accept this criticism if you can find a single instance of me making any sort of comment on Godly's appearance.

http://imgur.com/0g55Psz

Found it!
28-02-2016, 16:37
Band of Horses

This is the closest you're going to find:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Palem

I'm probably going to need a middle name, last name, social security and blood type if I want a challenge accepted lol

and yes Goldy, I'm saying you're not good at utopia. As terribad as I am, you're worse. Proven by your immediate tail-tucking after I accepted your challenge ;)

And on multiple instances Palem warned people for personal insults and commended Godly on being a good sport. He did let us call him tanboy but that was mostly mink and done via log posts from irc.

I'm not taking a side here, not that it would matter lol. Boys will be boys, and Godly took a lot of abuse so maybe a little slack?
28-02-2016, 17:17
Korp

Quote:

Originally Posted by Band of Horses

This is the closest you're going to find:

And on multiple instances Palem warned people for personal insults and commended Godly on being a good sport. He did let us call him tanboy but that was mostly mink and done via log posts from irc.

I'm not taking a side here, not that it would matter lol. Boys will be boys, and Godly took a lot of abuse so maybe a little slack?

No, closest was me, you just suck. :
28-02-2016, 18:24
Band of Horses

Quote:

Originally Posted by Korp

No, closest was me, you just suck. :

Giving him tay tay and intentionally misspelling his name is not an insult on his appearance. That taunt was a gift since it gave him reprieve from the wrath of trigger gifs.
28-02-2016, 21:21
StratOcastle

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niftythrifty350

You guys have a final war summary?

Forgive us for not offering a formal final war update. I'd do it if I knew how.

If the condition of my province is a microcosm of the overall kingdom picture then consider this:
80% of my acres were unbuilt by eow due to raze, and I build all war as common practice.

I'm in Pyromaniacs if you didn't know.
29-02-2016, 00:22
DM_Benjamin

Quote:

Originally Posted by Palem

I'll accept this criticism if you can find a single instance of me making any sort of comment on Godly's appearance.

I never said that and from my memory, you never have. What you guys have allowed is people to make fun of godly (fake tan, hence his appearance) yet godly made one remark about someone else's appearance and you are all over him.
29-02-2016, 01:52
Palem

Quote:

Originally Posted by DM_Benjamin

I never said that and from my memory, you never have. What you guys have allowed is people to make fun of godly (fake tan, hence his appearance) yet godly made one remark about someone else's appearance and you are all over him.

I'll accept this criticism if you can find me one instance of me allowing people to make fun of Godly's appearance here on the forums (where I actually have some sort of authority).

As far as Godly making one comment and me jumping on him. From the past week:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godly

It's only $20 now, but I know that twerp munk will jack his prices up if Stinger goes home.

^Insulting

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godly

Hide at the bottom all you want, you're still the trash tier of utopia. There should never be a thread of 7 pages for this nonsense.

^Trolling

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godly

Your picture doesn't help. Maybe if you didn't dress like a 12 year old with a Justin Bieber haircut, you'd gather more respect on these forums.

^Insulting someone's personal appearance (strike one)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godly

citadella, you should probably be avoiding having any conversation with me as you are not in charge of your kingdom and are just a little noob. It's probably not in your best interest to trigger/provoke me. Others in my kingdom seem to like you guys and I believe Dirty played in your ghetto for some reason. But make no mistake about it... while your kingdom spends effort staying as small as possible to abuse ghettos with low coordination to try to win fake honor and WW crowns that I have minimal respect for, I grow my kingdoms to be very powerful. I think I speak for most in the top tier: You should probably shut your mouth and enjoy your free crowns on the back of avoiding the top kingdoms you have no business communicating with. I may not like Fake Pyro very much, but I also refuse to sit around and watch a bunch of scrubs **** talking a kingdom that has an ACTUAL crown in utopia and the overall disrespect of this community shown by citing your kingdom as the best warring kingdom of all time. Seriously... of all time? Your kingdom would be tossed around like a 5 dollar hooker even against this lightweight top tier let alone back in the day. So I say it again: have your fun wars, pick up some fake crowns, but DO NOT EVER compare your accomplishments to anything of the giants of utopia.

^Insulting/trolling

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godly

I dont waste my time with pretenders.

^Trolling

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godly

I am a nice guy as well, but I am just more competitive than you are. You will never understand the thought process of a champion. However, I'm an open book and since you keep wanting to pry into my personal life, here are the facts: I have been in therapy for a long time due to my competitive desires and its impact on managing relationships with other human beings. As my shrink always tells me, you cant find a truly great person without a cup of narcissism and a dash of megalomania.

^Trolling

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godly

You are not a truly great person so you wouldn't understand.

^Trolling

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godly

I can only go by your record in utopia and what I see in your picture.

^Insulting a utopian's appearance (strike two)

I turn the other way for Godly and everyone else for that matter probably far more than I should. I'm not being unreasonable. I'm not letting people insult people's looks. Not only is it just incredibly classless, but it drives people away from using the forum. You have zero legs to stand on and again, this isn't up for debate.
29-02-2016, 01:53
jwuzi

Tswift looks like she's got no legs to stand on either.

Girl needs to do squats
29-02-2016, 02:58
Lestat

hehe Salty tude.

Are you alright Godly? Seem pretty ****ed up at the moment.
29-02-2016, 05:25
Band of Horses

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwuzi

Tswift looks like she's got no legs to stand on either.

Girl needs to do squats

And lose that perfect thigh gap? Insulting Taylor Swift imo is the worst offense you can make on these forums, reported.
29-02-2016, 06:06
DM_Benjamin

Quote:

Originally Posted by Palem

. You have zero legs to stand on and again, this isn't up for debate.

You are wrong, no debate needed. Rest easy
29-02-2016, 14:06
Sheister

Can we retitle this thread, Palem v Godly? I don't want people to think I endorse this product.
29-02-2016, 14:11
Palem

Why? Godly isn't the one arguing with me lol
29-02-2016, 14:46
Sheister

Oh? I guess that is what I get for skimming. All I saw was "blah blah blah Palem, Blah blah blah Godly."
29-02-2016, 15:28
Zauper

amigad round 2!
29-02-2016, 16:07
StratOcastle

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zauper

amigad round 2!

I'm as surprised as you are. I was hoping we'd put on some acres and give you guys something to deal with.

Ynow that sound when you're reading or watching tv and a bird fles into your window...
29-02-2016, 16:28
Zauper

So, not surprised at all? :p
29-02-2016, 17:30
Aranfein

I see FS tagged no war? Will it be a forced war or just farming them as revenge for them beating you?
29-02-2016, 17:37
2Utopian

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aranfein

I see FS tagged no war? Will it be a forced war or just farming them as revenge for them beating you?

Explain why this would be such a bad strategy or should be frowned upon like you seem to insinuate Angels. Perhaps I misread your tone.
29-02-2016, 17:40
Zauper

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aranfein

I see FS tagged no war? Will it be a forced war or just farming them as revenge for them beating you?

Or perhaps just reminding the war tier that losing lots of land in war might win the battle(war) and lose the conflict (multi-war timespan!) pewpewpewpew.
29-02-2016, 18:19
LoRD_SaMPuaN

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zauper

Or perhaps just reminding the war tier that losing lots of land in war might win the battle(war) and lose the conflict (multi-war timespan!) pewpewpewpew.

please explain zauper - we were already 37k acres vs 45k of theirs when we agreed to war, they could do the exact same thing they are doing now back then & they could do it without losing a war.. also, every whoring kd can do the exact same thing to any war kd out there, so whats the point here?

p.s. i like how you rename war into battle btw..
29-02-2016, 18:35
Meep

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2Utopian

Explain why this would be such a bad strategy or should be frowned upon like you seem to insinuate Angels. Perhaps I misread your tone.

Because Pyro claims to be warring this age and they already lost the war, aren't going to get another war, and are just preventing either KD from actually getting to war for the foreseeable future.
29-02-2016, 18:36
Zauper

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoRD_SaMPuaN

please explain zauper - we were already 37k acres vs 45k of theirs when we agreed to war, they could do the exact same thing they are doing now back then & they could do it without losing a war.. also, every whoring kd can do the exact same thing to any war kd out there, so whats the point here?

p.s. i like how you rename war into battle btw..

Yes, they could have. But on the flip side, your strategy is largely based on losing land in war -- you run very few attackers, you tend to lose a lot of land off your hitters, especially if the war doesn't run super long -- so it's quite easy for a kingdom to withdraw from the war and then turn around and beat you afterwards due to all the land you lost in war.

That strategy only works if kingdoms aren't willing to turn around and wave you again after.
29-02-2016, 18:40
citadela01

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoRD_SaMPuaN

...

meh ... let them have their fun Francis, nothing we can do anyway atm, youll just drag all the trolls out in the open.
29-02-2016, 18:41
Zauper

Quote:

Originally Posted by citadela01

meh ... let them have their fun Francis, nothing we can do anyway atm, youll just drag all the trolls out in the open.

That would be if someone were to say, for example --

Don't worry FS, if you just tell them you aren't hostile, perhaps pyro will wave them and save you!

:p

Honestly, I don't know why you guys didn't anticipate this? I've expected it since the WD.
29-02-2016, 18:41
Meep

Quote:

Originally Posted by citadela01

meh ... let them have their fun Francis, nothing we can do anyway atm, youll just drag all the trolls out in the open.

It's been weeks since drama, we need more drama, I strongly advocate this thread continuing down this road.
29-02-2016, 18:48
citadela01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zauper

That would be if someone were to say, for example --

Don't worry FS, if you just tell them you aren't hostile, perhaps pyro will wave them and save you!

:p

Honestly, I don't know why you guys didn't anticipate this? I've expected it since the WD.

Who says we didnt ?
29-02-2016, 18:51
Zauper

Quote:

Originally Posted by citadela01

Who says we didnt ?

Shrug, maybe you did and you planned to just give it up. That's certainly possible, though a bit surprising.
29-02-2016, 18:51
jmiedema

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zauper

That would be if someone were to say, for example --

Don't worry FS, if you just tell them you aren't hostile, perhaps pyro will wave them and save you!

:p

Honestly, I don't know why you guys didn't anticipate this? I've expected it since the WD.

Do people really need MORE reasons to never want to go to war from a disadvantaged position in this game. Now the meta will be "Run all heavy attackers, max gain the other kd for 48h, WD, then farm all the honour and sci they got from the win afterwards" Seems like a healthy meta. It used to be that you would war a kingdom, lay everything out, then afterwards you shake hands and go after other kingdoms.. I personally don't even op/steal or learn/plunder an enemy kingdom after we have warred them in an age. Maybe I'm just weird like that.

We also came out ahead in acres in our other wars, so you can't really say our strategy is built around losing acres. That was just a way that we won that war. Just making the best out of the situation we were dealt.
29-02-2016, 18:55
2Utopian

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meep

Because Pyro claims to be warring this age and they already lost the war, aren't going to get another war, and are just preventing either KD from actually getting to war for the foreseeable future.

Thanks Angels!
29-02-2016, 18:59
citadela01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zauper

Shrug, maybe you did and you planned to just give it up. That's certainly possible, though a bit surprising.

There was nothing we could do to stop it, also call it a test of character if you will. We were interested to see if they wave us or not.
29-02-2016, 19:06
LoRD_SaMPuaN

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zauper

Shrug, maybe you did and you planned to just give it up. That's certainly possible, though a bit surprising.

its quite naive to say they are going for a 'long term win', obviously they are only trying to mend their ego which was only hurt because of their big mouth.. we are only helping them by letting them win as big as possible here, so they can finally satisfy themselves as the winner, and move on..
29-02-2016, 19:27
Gorash

So far for the respect I had after the great war we fought, guess that was not mutual respect. I'm sorry to see you got so butt hurt over your loss, next time remember what Utopia is about: Strategy RPG for Hardcore Players. Guess not everyone is Hardcore these days. In a way I feel honoured, enjoy your acres and honour, FREAAKS only care about WW.
29-02-2016, 19:28
LoRD_SaMPuaN

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorash

So far for the respect I had after the great war we fought, guess that was not mutual respect. I'm sorry to see you got so butt hurt over your loss, next time remember what Utopia is about: Strategy RPG for Hardcore Players. Guess not everyone is Hardcore these days. In a way I feel honoured, enjoy your acres and honour, FREAAKS only care about WW.

who the hell is freaaks?
29-02-2016, 19:32
Gorash

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoRD_SaMPuaN

who the hell is freaaks?

Darn AC.. ;)
29-02-2016, 20:23
Aranfein

2Utopian - Sorry but not sure what you are on about? I asked a legitimate question as I know FS & Pyro are/was friends, im not sure why you would do a round 2 vs a kingdom you are friends with, that is obviously not interested by the looks of it, so I asked if it was revenge for losing (as in dragging war for ages to turn tides, when pyro players seemed to assume it was game over and wanted the wd).

I'm really not sure what your issue with my post was 0_o

Thanks for that astounding strategy explanation Zauper :p, not what I was on about though, it's a given any KD holding their own will be able to WD acres up at minimum time, has been like that last 5/10 ages when warring FS, their strategy/setup lays in long wars.
29-02-2016, 20:24
Band of Horses

I agree with Zauper 100%. Or as Jeb! said, you have to be willing to lose the primary to win the general. Please clap.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page