Last (free) cf proposal from us was declined by CD. Their arguing was that they were glad holding a 17-day meter on us. They getting outside intervention?
Printable View
Last (free) cf proposal from us was declined by CD. Their arguing was that they were glad holding a 17-day meter on us. They getting outside intervention?
SHOTS FIRED!!!!!! :-p awesomesauce :)Quote:
Originally Posted by ThRaZe
I feel there is alot of rapage going on here... Rape = a man taking whats his :-p too soon?Quote:
Originally Posted by Band of Horses
A woman can too! #feministQuote:
Originally Posted by umajon911
What's the math at for CF now?
I wouldn't call Bart a man, but guess you know him more intimate umajon ;)
On a different note, Sparta is in a legit hostile, its not their fault CD is randoming out, so any interference would set a new standard of not respecting hostiles in the top, not a very smart choice given i know how far Bart would go to exploit that (Sorry Bart but you know its true lol)
Ofc the top has to agree with this being hostile. Pyro hostiled divinity down past 50% for what seemed like a total of a month. Top preaches about closing hostiles, would be hypocritical to not honor this. I also doubt anyone is planning that.
Yet there were complaints about CDs hostile tag and people (in this thread as well) said to take it down cause it wasnt a legit hostile anymore when CD started randoming out and not hitting Sparta back anymore (as well as being semi waved and hit hard by other kds).Quote:
Originally Posted by Aranfein
If CR or Emeriti or whoever wanna move in on Sparta they are free to as the hostile been utterly one sided for a long time now. After all, its been OK for other kds to move in on CD.
My memory is terrible but back in the day bottom feeding wasn't considered a hostile. Because a kingdom could just wave a small kingdom make ridiculous demands and dodge/stall opponents. I would never respect this as a true hostile do to the ridiculous demands for a cf.
yes there are tons of examples like thatQuote:
Originally Posted by handofthrawn
10% for CF = ridiculous demands?Quote:
Originally Posted by handofthrawn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart of Sparta
Im sure he referring to other demands that came after that. 40% or 9.5k land from a 23k kd was a pretty ridiculous demand?
Or as you told me ingame when i tried talking to you to find a solution "Any CF terms now would be so severe that your KD will no doubt refuse them."
10% is standard for a cf with terms, but last i heard you have taken alot more then that and are refusing to cf now. But that's not the point in the old days bottom feeding was never considered a true hostile after so long. That's why you had to be careful about who you tax and what diplo you do. You can't wave a kingdom 50% smaller then you for 2 weeks while you explore your cows and expect hostile protection.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart of Sparta
I offered them a CF this morning, 72 hours notification. Was refused because they want to "keep the meter".Quote:
Originally Posted by handofthrawn
We're not protected by our hostile, we're protected by our CFs.
@hand and @shai
At what percentage size difference are two kingdoms hostile legit vs not legit?
Hello there Mr. Reasonable,Quote:
Originally Posted by Shai
Those were not complaints; that was mockery of how bad your KD is. Those KDs are free to hit CD because they randomed out; we haven't; from our side the hostile should be respected; it wasn't anyway and we got hit, just saying. Your KD is a joke as is your Uto lawyer logic; total hypocrisy; you are just lucky we are Sparta - we have no connections in the top and we just don't care all that much about hostile tags and CFs until you decide to cross us.