correction: baka wants us to be in war before doing anything. Seems more like they wana hide...Quote:
Originally Posted by Awesomeness
Printable View
correction: baka wants us to be in war before doing anything. Seems more like they wana hide...Quote:
Originally Posted by Awesomeness
i'm glad that i'm finally apart of one of these big drama threads :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Palem
Were did I mention anything about being angry, or not being angry anymore? You're trying to find ways to excuse your own stupidity now by making false assumptions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
Of course I'd be angry, but would deal with it another time.
Oh, and there is a slight difference between robbing into an active hostile, a single hit into active hostile, or doing fullout wave into an active hostile.
Who is using retarded logic now?
I don't know if you even read what you quoted. I get the impression you're trying to be cool by quoting other peoples post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korp
If I hostile Fury, and during that hostile steal from HoH, I should not complain if HoH takes action against my robbing. So no, I wouldn't scream double hostile. Then again, that would never happen; I'm not as stupid as these cats.
So were is the logic now, Korp? Come with good arguments or stfu.
See not our fault... We'r just stupid and silly :(Quote:
Originally Posted by prot
This is nothing like what happened (unless you can prove otherwise*) we never stole from Simians after we waved Vengance (and atleast not for the ~12 hours leading up to this) what we did was steal from them after waveing Dopefiends, to get gc to fund new dragon after haveing started one at Dopefiends. And at that point we were still tagged Hostile (slacking at getting back to normal kd name).Quote:
Originally Posted by prot
*I could be wrong, someone could have done it and not admit to doing it, but then I would appreciate if Simians told me who and when.
It was a question..Quote:
Were did I mention anything about being angry, or not being angry anymore? You're trying to find ways to excuse your own stupidity now by making false assumptions.
Why? It would be perfectly fine using your own logic.Quote:
Of course I'd be angry, but would deal with it another time.
Yea, getting robbed you should be thankfull that the enemy kd didnt get the gold instead ;)Quote:
Oh, and there is a slight difference between robbing into an active hostile, a single hit into active hostile, or doing fullout wave into an active hostile.
My logic is sound still, its like how you now talk smack but before you were the one coming to them asking for cf be nice and all. All top kingdoms are hypocrtical bunch of douches.
How silly....Quote:
maybe if u guys could talk properly without being silly
this thread just makes me lol
GangBangs are for cowards but hey ghettos do ghettos moves.
enlighten us with your warring kd wisdomQuote:
Originally Posted by fuzzy|
Baka - Don't forget HoH too (one of my favourite topfeeds) ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by baka
Elurin you seem to have been very naughty this age, I tend to agree with the top kd view, though GB is a bit harsh. When we (Pulse) had a much smaller "warring kd" steal from us repeatedly (in hostile too) we just took it out directly and independently on them (razing into the war they stole gc from us to fight).
to the above - lol ive charted more times in the top 10 land / nw charts than i have for warring (in recent years that is)Quote:
Originally Posted by Awesomeness
theres a big difference when GangBanging a kingdom because they farming to move up a certain chart or because they target your alliance kingdoms (by this I mean rogue ghettos who do nothing but hit into wars / hostiles just because 'they 'can') but to call for a GangBang onto a smaller kingdom who's crime is robbing resources is weak in my book.
I do not condone what sillies supposedly did (i.e. the robbing of gc) and at some point if you play with fire you get burnt but it on its own does not create a good enough reason to try and organise a GangBang. Hell next age people will do GangBangs because someone looked at a kingdom the wrong way.
GangBangs do not belong in this game unless the utopia community as a whole ask for one and it its deemed necessary.
doubt this will end up in a gangbang. looking forward to simians policing them thats all ;)
o' yeah I hope that's the case to.Quote:
Originally Posted by Awesomeness
Ive been involved in to many GangBangs and well I regret 75% of them :(
Utopia never has been about 1 on 1 play, although some recent rules have guided towards it. The majority of 1 on 1 play is based on prescribing to certain accepted norms. Robbing someone is ok, robbing someone all age without being willing to ceasefire is not. Everyone has the choice to do as they please although it should go without saying if you upset enough people with egos you WILL get gangbanged.
I personally enjoy being gangbanged, if your kingdom does as well, then you played this age perfectly. If your kingdom wishes to play 1 on 1 wars and get war wins with your fearies intact, you played the game poorly.
Gangbangs generally can be quite easily avoided too, simply apologize, move on, offer ceasefires and no one will gangbang you. The art of FSU up is to do it just to the point where people will snap. You're at that point, whether your age ends up being a successful FSU age or not is up to you I suppose in the next day or so.
I personally have been trying to organize a GB on you for the last few days, and I don't even play in the top. I just find it fun and want to meep meep that jeep.
I know its not directed at me but.....Quote:
Originally Posted by flogger
why would you hurt a kingdom that's done nothing to you? merely because you can? if you were still in the top and have age goals i doubt you would bother taking time out of your age to join in a stupid GB.