Mercy vs Pulse round 2.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ervgotti

Inso was not a war.....Try to be relevant when upping your post count.

Thanks

---

But PW was :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by goodz

how about its all stories unless you crowned with over 20k players. So we can ignore all 3 of you

---

Burn. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by goodz

Pulse is about to war a 4th time. You a third. But pulse had a few war wins earlyier in age rather then dicing and imo they warred three good kingdoms where as you had 1 serious war and farmed one ghetto. So I think pulse likely had to spend more time preparing etc. Anyway I guestimated they spent about hald the age in war mode. Probably 10% of it randoming. so imo thats a good spread of the age.

---

Pulse had THE SAME NUMBER OF FIGHTS as Mercy. Mercy had one less conflict go to war. That's literally the only difference between us. We fought at nearly identical points in the age (Mercy vs Inso came during/after Sanc vs Pulse, Mercy vs Pulse was obviously identical, Mercy vs Psych Ward came a couple of weeks before Rage vs Pulse). What you "think" is irrelevant, these are facts.

You're trying to present a narrative that doesn't reflect reality. In plain terms, you're making **** up that isn't true. I fail to see how a kingdom that warred OOP could "spend more time preparing" than a kingdom that had to pump to topfeed wave the top kingdom. Also, if you think we didn't execute a lengthy and massive pump to fight Psych Ward, you're crazy.

I'm done responding to you, goodz. I've shown, time and again, that what you say is not true. I've pointed out how you contradict yourself, and I've pointed out how what you've posted is completely wrong - that the facts show that what you're saying is completely untrue. Your posts are almost entirely wrong repeatedly, and are not worth any more of my time.

Good luck with the rest of your age.

oh damn, goodz getting schooled big time.

TheRock become way too serious, he was better when he was a nub.

the cock b mad tho.

The difference between a war and a conflict is pretty significant.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KuhaN

the cock b mad tho.

---

Only mad that my power's out until Saturday night :) The rest is just calling out bull****, it's been a fun ride telling people their lies and lies.

Ball don't lie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Palem

The difference between a war and a conflict is pretty significant.

---

Yeah, we didn't get the boosts of postwar and the war win. Other than that? 500 hits exchanged between two kingdoms over 5 days is really not that different.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ervgotti

Joncy,

How are you 360k acres? Guess what....winning a war and getting the ridiculous war win bonus. Did you farm that kd? Are they just really really bad or really chilled?

The war win land bonus at such high acres sways objectivity of the war way too much for the simpleton. (Ahem, fix)

Let's look at a hypothetical age ending close matchup btw #1 and #2.

Both kds start at 350k acres

Land exchange is +5% (17.5k acres) for the winning party.

Winner becomes 385k -- (350000 + 17500)*1.05
Loser becomes 315k -- (350000 - 17500)*.95

Damn, 70k difference.....Is this a farming??? Debate.

---

There's nth to debate abt whether trinity/fury/pw is a bad kd. y u mad though?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Palem

The difference between a war and a conflict is pretty significant.

---

I would love to hear you justify that opinion. If anything a quality and lengthy hostile is more difficult than a war; working around GBP, hitting NW efficient, no war bonuses, no protection from outside kingdoms, no EOW recovery period, etc etc etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheRock

Yeah, we didn't get the boosts of postwar and the war win. Other than that? 500 hits exchanged between two kingdoms over 5 days is really not that different.

---

Aww TheRock already beat me to it.

More difficult and not as good of a reward.

Less land gains
Minimal honor gains
No war win bonuses

Quote:

---

I would love to hear you justify that opinion. If anything a quality and lengthy hostile is more difficult than a war; working around GBP, hitting NW efficient, no war bonuses, no protection from outside kingdoms, no EOW recovery period, etc etc etc.

---

Wait a minute did you just own yourself? Or these are not significant differences between war and a conflict?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Palem

More difficult and not as good of a reward.

Less land gains
Minimal honor gains
No war win bonuses

---

Which supports our point of view, so thanks I guess?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Korp

Wait a minute did you just own yourself? Or these are not significant differences between war and hostile?

---

The context of the convo is that Pulse had a harder time cuz they warred once more than we did, when in reality we had the same number of conflicts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DHaran

Which supports our point of view, so thanks I guess?



The context of the convo is that Pulse had a harder time cuz they warred once more than we did, when in reality we had the same number of conflicts.

---

Pulse had a harder time cuz Pulse warred 3 cleric kingdoms and not a sage and merchant kingdom, neither of which were pumped.