Simians vs Pew Pew

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

22-01-2014, 04:03
Ovenmitt

Quote:

Originally Posted by faegan

Like I told you in PM: I am not saying that using VM as a way to escape a slaughter is the right thing to do. Current game rules state that if you are not in VM according to admins, they can kick you out of VM. There is no other penalty than being kicked out. So I think Ovenmitt did what was best for the kingdom..he saved the acres and bought time. It'll be a suprise to everyone when (yes WHEN) he gets booted out of VM...

Going on vaca doesn't preclude a conflict already or presently occuring, nor does it stipulate any other terms.
22-01-2014, 04:42
Eurycratides

Quote:

Originally Posted by Palem

muhahahahaha

Thank you. I needed a good reason to love utopia again :)

Admin reads a thread about how a cheater uses vacation mode to exploit, and decides it is time to love utopia again.
22-01-2014, 04:44
Band of Horses

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eurycratides

Admin reads a thread about how a cheater uses vacation mode to exploit, and decides it is time to love utopia again.

1. He is a mod not an admin
2. It was Paul Walker being an Undead
3. Really????
22-01-2014, 04:59
Crunch

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ovenmitt

Going on vaca doesn't preclude a conflict already or presently occuring, nor does it stipulate any other terms.

No VM
x-log FTW admins ok with it just ask pyro..
22-01-2014, 05:02
Chuck

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ovenmitt

Going on vaca doesn't preclude a conflict already or presently occuring, nor does it stipulate any other terms.

There are 13 pages here of conflict smart one. LOL. Keep trying.
22-01-2014, 05:15
Palem

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eurycratides

Admin reads a thread about how a cheater uses vacation mode to exploit, and decides it is time to love utopia again.

Are there any other games that I'm not the admin of and not playing that you want me to care that people are cheating in? Hearthstone? LoL? Monopoly?
22-01-2014, 06:07
StratOcastle

This situation reminds me of the Mo'Nique character in Beerfest.
22-01-2014, 06:09
Spice

If this is vm abuse, then ED putting their biggie in vm was abuse aswell. ED was not punished.
22-01-2014, 06:15
tetley

at least Ryan wasn't getting attacked at the time he jumped VM last age.
22-01-2014, 06:54
Spice

He could of been, as he was bounced prior to vms aswell.
22-01-2014, 08:55
Elit

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spice

If this is vm abuse, then ED putting their biggie in vm was abuse aswell. ED was not punished.

Its was abuse just we didn't bother to report ED.
22-01-2014, 10:27
Ovenmitt

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuck

There are 13 pages here of conflict smart one. LOL. Keep trying.

im gonna teach you all about what the word preclude means
22-01-2014, 10:39
Elldallan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anri

A troll that thinks VM abuse is funny and wants to avoid the subject. No good nobody. Game rules need to be upheld. In the current status of this game even more important. Esp vs the kd that been abusing this game the most the last ages and keeps getting away with it. Maybe, just maybe you like the game to have no rules and maybe we shoult let more abuses in the game be okey. Why not. If we only had known this last age. We would gone 25 green provs eoa...

So did you report it yet?

Quote:

Originally Posted by faegan

Like I told you in PM: I am not saying that using VM as a way to escape a slaughter is the right thing to do. Current game rules state that if you are not in VM according to admins, they can kick you out of VM. There is no other penalty than being kicked out. So I think Ovenmitt did what was best for the kingdom..he saved the acres and bought time. It'll be a suprise to everyone when (yes WHEN) he gets booted out of VM...

Well, for a single offense that seems to be the normal punishment, although for experienced players that are supposed to know the rules you might as well go for the more severe ones right from the start, boot him out of protection and give him a 48h suspension for starters.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spice

If this is vm abuse, then ED putting their biggie in vm was abuse aswell. ED was not punished.

I might be mistaken but I don't remember him running around the forums and bragging about it, maybe he had the sense to stay away from the forum or anywhere else the admin/devs can track him but Ovenmitt is doggedly watching this thread(keeps popping up in the "users browsing this thread)
22-01-2014, 10:54
Anri

Its reported correct. No reason not to report clear abuse.
22-01-2014, 12:35
Ovenmitt

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elldallan

So did you report it yet?

Well, for a single offense that seems to be the normal punishment, although for experienced players that are supposed to know the rules you might as well go for the more severe ones right from the start, boot him out of protection and give him a 48h suspension for starters.

I might be mistaken but I don't remember him running around the forums and bragging about it, maybe he had the sense to stay away from the forum or anywhere else the admin/devs can track him but Ovenmitt is doggedly watching this thread(keeps popping up in the "users browsing this thread)

im actually as curious as the rest of you how it will be resolved. There is no precedent for not being able to enter vm just because you are being attacked. i dont think im wrong, but i dont think its wrong for others to have their opinions and interpretations either.

ergo: if i cant go on vaca because i'm being attacked, why have vm at all? etc

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page