Originally Posted by
PhoenixScorpion
First off that's just logical fallacies one after another it is hard to know where to even start. If we supposedly made a deal in bad faith and our whole plan and intention was just to act in bad faith I am pretty sure we would have. People can personally want revenge on you, discuss pretext and context for why it would be acceptable to return perceived treatment and pretexts used, without being a hypocrite or asshole. Quite the contrary, I would argue that the fact we acted honorable and didnt use our personal feelings and historical conventions to effect or influence our reaction and sense of fair-play means that your argument is just outright false.
To suppose that everything that one types/says is to be taken literally or as a supposition of factual reality is extremely poor logic. One thing has completely no correlation to the other. This is proven by the fact that in reality you never got ****played, in spite of the fact you QQ to contrary. I hope your are joking when you say there was never an opportune time for us to exploit the situation and GB or whatever if we wished. If we are such "two-faced assholes" as you say, we have actually had more than enough pretext to GB as soon as we knew where your KD was located.
Your KD and their allies ensured that any pretext can be used by any set of KD's to do whatever they wish. I find it interesting that now you dont understand why others are predisposed to treat you in a similar fashion to which you have treated them in past. Didnt AMA just last Age threaten to make a CF/deal void with Rage at a time of their leisure due to an arbitrary decision made by their member KD's? In spite what we say in private or our personal feelings we have never acted in such a manner diplomatically with you, while you have done whatever you see fit when it suits you.