Originally Posted by
Meeni
If activity level determined how good you were at this game, i'd suggest trying Farmville. What the hell does 'on an even activity level with no clear advantage' mean??
1. There are good setups and there are bad ones
2. There are good tactics and there are bad ones
3. There are good strategies and there are bad ones
4. There are advantages within races/personas
5. There is history within the age that affects your performance (wars no wars etc)
6. There are various risk levels that you can take
7. There are politics that help promote or prevent actions
8. There are actions not in your control (the effect of being in a MMO)
Why is it that ghettos always think it's about activity??
On the contrary. If you are a good kingdom or a good player, your activity requirement can be as low as 15 minutes a day. It's all about accessibility. If i can be on 'patrol' for 1 hr a day, but be able to access at any time, and so can my teammates (internet phones) then my kd can effectively respond to threats within minutes without demanding any unusual activity.
And like i mentioned earlier, when the kd can effectively log on 24 hours a day and that's all that's going on you got farmville.
Back to new player interviews, i gotta repeat what has been said a few times already - i don't care about your average joe player... been there and done that, what insights are you going to give me? "the tornado was THIS big"...
the only people that matter are the ones that did something worth reading about and have a clue.