anonymous voting sucks! next time make it non-anonymous!
gotta be brave and courageous and tell the world what you feel!
Printable View
anonymous voting sucks! next time make it non-anonymous!
gotta be brave and courageous and tell the world what you feel!
this thread is entertaining
I don't understand all this QQ.
AMA/BB doing what we did last age -- there wasn't as much QQ last age and people were playing their advantages against said kingdoms. In the end it seems that people are upset that people are better. There seems to be a top tier of kingdoms and rather than trying to fight for 'honor' and fame. Each of those kingdoms will employ tactics to secure as many acres as possible. I've always been interested in the server-wide 'meta-relations' but that has seemed to matter less and less as the amount of top kds fall and people keep backstabbing each other. There is less fun to be the 'most honorable' kd, when it means that the less honorable top kd will gain an advantage over you and win over you (provided both have equal skills but one kingdom 'forced' more advantages).
Game mechanics will have a hard time to fix this. Also -- I think there are some players that enjoy this drama too much :)
ps.
I voted no ;)
if AMA and BB wernt around it'll be RBL (example only) and CR (example only) doing that same things no?
one will only get replaced by another (and repeat)
FYI i voted no ;)
no? big kingdoms gonna be big.
you are all a bunch of fools. this drama at the top is the only thing keeping this game spiced up. for me at least.
I voted yes, we definitely ruin the game and Snirpsner is right to point this out!
Kingdoms that refuse to just go to war at an advantage are even more ruinous don't you think?
You probably think you are funny....
Munk, for my part what find utterly insufferable about them is that they can't just give a straightup fight no matter how many advantages they have. when CR decided to go for legacy, well knowing its skill and experience advantages and also aware of legacy's size and NW advantages, they gave button. Here, where BB has NW, land, gold, skill, experience, cow, and every other advantage I can think of except for perhaps basic production economy on core, they can't just give button. No, they have to use a lame tactic that abuses the relations system.
Simply repugnant.
I have lot more respect for CR than I will ever have for BB. I don't feel kindly towards CR, so ........
No, when CR is in a position of clear advantage, they at least have the common decency to give button.
It was a good strategy they were using as they wanted to maxmize acres gained :) Why are you so mad Sheister?