Originally Posted by
Palem
What am I taking out of context?
You guys were playing like ****. You were playing so poorly that you as the monarch were considering surrendering. Then you cite pyro's attitude as the reason you decided not to surrender. When a monarch is thinking to himself "Man, we're playing like ****. We should probably surrender" and then decides not to because he doesn't like the way the other kingdom is talking to him, that's bad. In the other case, if the actual reason you didn't surrender wasn't because of Pyro's attitude, but rather a prevailing faith in your ability to execute as a kingdom and establish a comeback, then you're just trying to throw some extra jabs at Pyro and make the war loss even worse for them. As if they had just had a better attitude, then they would have won. If that's the case, then that's just as bad.
I'm not sure why I'm getting so much shade out of the FS corner. I wasn't in here stomping my feet about how you guys should surrender. Is FS above objective criticisms?